Re: [Icar] icar futures?

"Alex Rousskov" <rousskov@measurement-factory.com> Tue, 16 November 2004 17:43 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA23387 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:43:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU7P2-000366-Jw for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:46:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU75G-0006xk-V3; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:25:38 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CU6zC-0004eX-Jp for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:19:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA21176 for <icar@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:19:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from measurement-factory.com ([206.168.0.5]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CU71Q-0002SH-C5 for icar@ietf.org; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:21:41 -0500
Received: from pail.measurement-factory.com (nat.measurement-factory.com [206.168.0.3]) by measurement-factory.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAGHJ0J2088679; Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:19:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from rousskov@measurement-factory.com)
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, mallman@icir.org
Subject: Re: [Icar] icar futures?
References: <20041116142954.5409577AA12@guns.icir.org> <419A214C.5040509@zurich.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <opshkidyrjiz3etf0c9082f7@pail.measurement-factory.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 10:19:00 -0700
From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Organization: The Measurement Factory
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <419A214C.5040509@zurich.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (FreeBSD, build 751)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: icar@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On Tue, 2004/11/16 (MST), <brc@zurich.ibm.com> wrote:

> My guess is that to corporate suits, "directorate" sounds
> like a control point and "review" sounds passive. If we can
> find a way of making "review" sound as important as we believe
> it to be, that will help.

How about a name with a "gatekeeper" in it? IETF Gatekeepers?
Sexy, important enough? There does not have to be much truth in the name,
I guess. It is all marketing.

Alex.

_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar