IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Icar] icar futures?

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Wed, 13 October 2004 17:38 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18253 for <icar-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:38:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHnGQ-0001MN-41 for icar-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:50:15 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHmwH-0007rP-RA; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:29:25 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CHmp7-0006Iy-Oi for icar@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:22:01 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17208 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:22:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from wyvern.icir.org ([192.150.187.14]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHn06-00014m-6p for icar@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:33:23 -0400
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-68-76-113-50.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [68.76.113.50]) by wyvern.icir.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9DHLuag067573 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mallman@guns.icir.org)
Received: from guns.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9291677AE41 for <icar@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:21:54 -0400 (EDT)
To: icar@ietf.org
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
Organization: ICSI Center for Internet Research (ICIR)
Song-of-the-Day: Peaches
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:21:54 -0400
Message-Id: <20041013172154.9291677AE41@guns.icir.org>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64
Subject: [Icar] icar futures?
X-BeenThere: icar@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: Improved Cross-Area Review <icar.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:icar@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar>, <mailto:icar-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0420153608=="
Sender: icar-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: icar-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: fb6060cb60c0cea16e3f7219e40a0a81

 
Folks-

From my seat, this is what I have observed:

  * there has been no list traffic

  * there has not been any updating of the early review i-d

  * there has been no clamoring for late review guidance

  * the call for reviewers for the ICAR experiment netted 7 reviewers

     + plus 1 who said "ok", but never got back to me with his
       information; plus another who said "as soon as I qualify"
     + and, even some of the most vocal advocates of early review didn't
       belly up when the time to do so came around

  * the IESG did not enthusiastically offer assistance with choosing WGs
    to help seed the process

This doesn't look like a lovely picture to me.  This really smells like
ICAR is something the community does not want.  Or, at least does not
want to put their energy into, in practice.  Joel and I would appreciate
any thoughts on moving forward (and, saying "ok, it didn't work" **is**
a path forward).

Thoughts?

Thanks,
allman


--
Mark Allman -- ICIR -- http://www.icir.org/mallman/




_______________________________________________
Icar mailing list
Icar@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/icar

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email