IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)

Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> Wed, 11 October 2017 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ideas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D8B1342D5; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qgaRHldqe17A; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EF1C13307B; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x7so1825854pfa.1; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2wtrRrRiJUYb6SbC0JHPiKS/y2wlVTMag0wC7ZbwS8U=; b=HGuCH4XbaiYONl2tX5xE4PVQxP9Kc9uAg1A5jGFazZlRv1yXmGokd6qhtn3QiEZzuh /wRa3/Z8L6QfjcTgihthPpp3/WUlzdx8iDllbC1GAiXav/2jGWGoej2+0vqB615SsZec MW0Rnqrpi3U7bhR+9mlbqvaRJNYXpz6Qx3bu2pHYUoLTxMOsKzW2dw7IvKBghwtB9UKs CGzRzCMA7eQYNhLvn2n04fE83ZTCftuQofgUR60dElv2nOU+BjKEE05CkQ+Ijafuhxe7 4VZEueG181AYJ4/dz3IcX+smSriGizxRjtSM2HOX+5cFYRWDlH8GzEcSU/Ri9MKbTpTJ GJgw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=2wtrRrRiJUYb6SbC0JHPiKS/y2wlVTMag0wC7ZbwS8U=; b=aC+p5vd01v+ffVbojjxYNVfQ0FsXNG4dm1oT2jROVCEFfo/sfm6HLM7scRnH6h8hEU COkxSpISis0eE6XKW8Rgu28rgCXLE+z+z4IA+pvPWQUXlgPqGADBH94Abh4VrZxHJCRq 20bQV9/oraJ7bg2q8qUm0dshe+snf/59qbyJc4SPwuZnpAz1h97fFoTPTLIhObmqNFOq wzOglFgyS/KWTi5gouCcbMK3nT8fbUQY+nCuHXNc3dHKf2W2pqT4zUbfT+ONkjHrCnHN eEF5xan7NWaM/hD2jdTKznEdPOxNUVXHf9PkMN25JsThxRLi+JgcJrWWxhgqRTja+Us+ 9vOw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVCghAoCGRxvC8cxvDrRTcM7JI8sXSkwpmhzuAJG0Gs6wdWgTNg P844A8d5IVQ+YSCeTJ75gsM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDolLyr+WMg9yGiZD3J63hGbdsbpIZC0RRXCXXZz485PUxR7CqagsC2X3fdymVhVLIpn7RqAA==
X-Received: by 10.98.192.6 with SMTP id x6mr110857pff.170.1507751190566; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.197.31.157] (173-11-119-245-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [173.11.119.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t81sm5116865pfg.187.2017.10.11.12.46.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALx6S36xXCEqwBMU-Xm1U_sK7Xo7A4mxYQYp56kkTGSP7gZtRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 12:46:29 -0700
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, ideas-chairs@ietf.org, ideas@ietf.org, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6025671C-8868-4955-B65B-99A497550FAC@gmail.com>
References: <150773363527.24819.15137383317907133805.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <47ABE650-B83D-4400-B27C-C0E5F1C8BA13@gmail.com> <CABcZeBMG+OyYv1Kaeb1BeuUX_Tc3yz8TYObtv7JTVteSuY35Gg@mail.gmail.com> <F0F78529-AB1A-4B5F-B18B-FFAAF72FC5F3@gmail.com> <CALx6S36xXCEqwBMU-Xm1U_sK7Xo7A4mxYQYp56kkTGSP7gZtRw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@herbertland.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ideas/0tCHtjAgRr60Zy2yyUYJXe1-R0w>
Subject: Re: [Ideas] Alissa Cooper's Block on charter-ietf-ideas-00-06: (with BLOCK)
X-BeenThere: ideas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions relating to the development, clarification, and implementation of control-plane infrastructures and functionalities in ID enabled networks." <ideas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ideas/>
List-Post: <mailto:ideas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ideas>, <mailto:ideas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 19:46:37 -0000

> The need for a common mapping system has already been discussed for for years in nvo3. With the emergence of identifier-locator protocols, and particularly their utility to provide seamless mobility at large scale, the need for a well defined mapping system has become more evident. IMO this is a problem IETF should work on.

A public mapping system has been discussed in the LISP WG (and many have been designed to compare tradeoffs) since 2009. And before that in the IRTF Routing RG dating back to 2006.

And there was/is a 30 country, 300 site pilot research network run by vendors/researchers/ISPs dating back to 2007.

Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email