[Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 04 June 2020 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D26D3A0FF0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:19:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id szUGvFIIwO03 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:19:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 275B23A0FEE for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 14:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.170.22.63;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:19:30 -0400
Message-ID: <005901d63ab5$d6003e00$8200ba00$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005A_01D63A94.4EF099D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdY6tdVkxp8DtMAESUGaQmjQW9iGlw==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200603-2, 06/03/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/-EuHBzIWgdyPIuG7DqPxmQHk_fQ>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 21:19:40 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt

>From 6/4 to 6/18/2020.  

 

There are 3 implementations:   BIRD (1.76, 2.05) , FRR, and Mikrotik. 

The BIRD and FRR implementations interoperate. 

I do not have details on Mikrotik.  

 

Details on the  interoperability are on the following IDR wiki page: 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy

 

Only one  error handling issues exists on the ability of BIRD 

to send Role Mismatch (Open Error (2), subcode 8).  

Another protocol was assigned to subcode 8.  

 

Please comment on the following questions: 

1) Is this specification ready for publication? 

2) Are there deployments where this BGP protocol extension is valuable? 

3) Do you believe the error code handling is ready for publication? 

 

The shepherd for this draft is Susan Hares.  

During the WG LC, the shepherd's report will be sent. 

 

Cheers,