Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 04 November 2016 10:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5E1129BDE; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDyHVB6NWaTq; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 03:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D64C212947D; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 03:31:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dresden.attlocal.net (99-59-193-67.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.59.193.67]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A4F01E369; Fri, 4 Nov 2016 06:34:18 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <8F8E9266-DAD3-48A7-BFFE-7CE8C103C529@apnic.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 06:31:42 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <50FBB9EC-F6C7-408E-A544-9D64E86E8293@pfrc.org>
References: <112dc01d235fd$57f9c370$07ed4a50$@ndzh.com> <C2DABF02-D3CB-4646-B869-FBCE5F05FDA1@apnic.net> <117ea01d23611$a28513e0$e78f3ba0$@ndzh.com> <CED07D95-A426-469C-85B4-DB2FBE52D14A@apnic.net> <20161104004725.GC17584@shrubbery.net> <DC44C8AC-F10A-4D6A-914A-EFD54A9B3888@apnic.net> <20161104075614.GU961@Vurt.local> <8F8E9266-DAD3-48A7-BFFE-7CE8C103C529@apnic.net>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/L2jAtZx7R9LVmxdWvCUv6TgHgyc>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, IETF IDR WG <idr@ietf.org>, rtg-dir@ietf.org, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 10:31:45 -0000

> On Nov 4, 2016, at 5:10 AM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 4 Nov. 2016, at 6:56 pm, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> wrote:
>> Given the above context, do you have a suggestion other then "pick eiher
>> a colon-delimited or bracketed"? My personal preference would be to
>> keep the original text.
>> 
> 
> I think you make a clear SHOULD support for a particular representation of the
> triplet, which makes other representations still ok, but there is a clear preference
> for interoperability that says “clearly state a preferred format for representating
> these values".

I believe the intent of saying it's an ordered tuple of Global Admin, Local Admin 1, Local Admin 2 is sufficient.

If you want to define delimiters, go write a yang module.

-- Jeff