IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Fri, 03 May 2019 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF7312013E; Fri, 3 May 2019 08:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nk0HBjyMf_hZ; Fri, 3 May 2019 08:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38E6C1200B8; Fri, 3 May 2019 08:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1228; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1556898569; x=1558108169; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DwLowSdvBJTz1h3NcgJfLQfBZ3K3EU7SA1dCuB0AzmY=; b=YWLFcMNQH+szikwcx9wNQFHLr+GPKx69p0hxx4ZQVhkgAq4qnSt8gAol 3BjTlyIJgBiA2PePFgc0Ha8o6iJnHpfEAh9uqUN/FRtF/x4LuvFpHguaO 1p119JcGBH/JTlbJ6hEj3Ouw+sMTKRpQjSxGpgXtOKianr826eVBlzK0P M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AHAADQYcxc/xbLJq1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUgQBAQEBCwGCeVEzKI0Li3kIJZhSgXsQGAuESgKCKTUIDgEDAQEEAQECAQJtHAyFSwEBBAEBGxUBBTYLEAsOCi4nMAYBDAYCAQEXgwcBggoPrz2ERkFAgyOBPwaBMgGLZIFAP4E4DIJfPoEEgV0BAQMBhz8Emh+NEwmCC4IDhBWMJwYbgg6GP4NGiTWMG4ZMjkWBUQMzgVYzGggbFTuCbIIniGuFQT0DMJFAAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,426,1549929600"; d="scan'208";a="11753949"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 03 May 2019 15:49:27 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.53] (ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com [10.60.140.53]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x43FnQSF021450; Fri, 3 May 2019 15:49:27 GMT
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr@ietf.org
References: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
Cc: draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <f5d7589e-2afa-9649-a91a-e411742af06c@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 17:49:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.60.140.53, ams-ppsenak-nitro4.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-2.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LekITbs7CgdNskvqPvixpQgOLts>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 15:49:32 -0000

Support.

thanks,
Peter

On 02/05/2019 15:13 , Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6
>
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext/
>
>
>
> Please consider the following questions in commenting on the
>
>
>
> 1)      Does this draft needed support for the SRV6?
>
> 2)      Is this draft a good starting point for the BGP support for SRv6?
>
> 3)      Do you know of any technical issues regarding this draft?
>
> If so, do these technical issues present any major problems to the
> technical solution?
>
>
>
> 4)      Do you know of any existing implementations or any plans for
> implementation?
>
>
>
> One special note, if you mentioning technical issues regarding a draft
> it can be helpful to the WG.  Our goal is to provide good BGP support of
> the Spring BGP-LS work in a timely fashion.  The SRv6 support is key to
> the Spring effort – so it would be helpful to mention and get resolved
> any issues with this draft.
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Sue Hares
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email