Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

"Kausik Majumdar (kmajumda)" <kmajumda@cisco.com> Thu, 02 May 2019 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <kmajumda@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6974A1200B6; Thu, 2 May 2019 11:29:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=IqqmRJFo; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Z+fJMdf1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JUl_ZhtxNLnN; Thu, 2 May 2019 11:29:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED52A120099; Thu, 2 May 2019 11:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=16704; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1556821784; x=1558031384; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=NXTfFlZd5ccN24YnBYH7b8O6oIlSrEqsw9+gmnWsrrI=; b=IqqmRJFo5FNiM7irlrPkkMmrZ8K39qBH373RxtEHU2d0s3Lc3N01exFd qO1EHv9lGAOQHYMX95T41egAMZIaoKy8dj5xgRC4PSfDqqRA2fCaCNHWV nn6juURlQptyrvlLUzJ/Y2VE0SsQRao0xqZjZS6C7bShzdk3VcnBEIE9R A=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3APVmmRhz0EXOm2IfXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9p?= =?us-ascii?q?sgjfdUf7+++4j5YhWN/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1?= =?us-ascii?q?kAgMQSkRYnBZuGDET5MfvmZgQxHd9JUxlu+HToeUU=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AIAABZNstc/4ENJK1lGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUQUBAQEBCwGBDi9QA2lVIAQLKIQQg0cDhFKKMYJXklaETIE?= =?us-ascii?q?ugSQDVA4BASMKhEACF4YcIzQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQJtHAyFSgEBAQQSCwYKEwE?= =?us-ascii?q?BNwEPAgEIEQMBAQEoAwICAjAUCQgBAQQBDQUIEweDAYEdTQMdAQIMoxoCgTW?= =?us-ascii?q?IX3GBL4J5AQEFgUZBgnwYgg4DBoEyAYtLF4FAP4FXghc1PoEEgV0CAwGBXx4?= =?us-ascii?q?NCYJUMoImjU2ES4gAjRAJAoIJhhiMQ4IOhjyMd4wWhkuOGAIEAgQFAg4BAQW?= =?us-ascii?q?BTziBVnAVgyeCD4NvhRSFP3KBKZM0AQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.60,422,1549929600"; d="scan'208,217";a="549942673"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 May 2019 18:29:42 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (xch-aln-016.cisco.com [173.36.7.26]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x42ITgeb022138 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 2 May 2019 18:29:42 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by XCH-ALN-016.cisco.com (173.36.7.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:29:41 -0500
Received: from xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:29:41 -0500
Received: from NAM05-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (173.37.151.57) by xhs-aln-003.cisco.com (173.37.135.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 2 May 2019 13:29:41 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-cisco-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=NXTfFlZd5ccN24YnBYH7b8O6oIlSrEqsw9+gmnWsrrI=; b=Z+fJMdf1nUKATqzqnr3Nds79QglydGFl8sdh/++k2FnQphMzieqajtoQzGlOibejikPIx2kmtKRRe5B0lcSR4bq67pW6QTFBLZsNF+IFi9qKaYF/FOYxCodP1FBiifJ2pOCZbyG7flitZHJuSu9T5cGibAb9aWPuBFKT2kNC9YE=
Received: from BYAPR11MB3544.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.206.17) by BYAPR11MB3735.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.178.238.84) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1856.11; Thu, 2 May 2019 18:29:38 +0000
Received: from BYAPR11MB3544.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::842e:6b7:baa6:1047]) by BYAPR11MB3544.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::842e:6b7:baa6:1047%3]) with mapi id 15.20.1856.008; Thu, 2 May 2019 18:29:38 +0000
From: "Kausik Majumdar (kmajumda)" <kmajumda@cisco.com>
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org" <draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org>, "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
Thread-Index: AdUA6N2Rf+SOd1UySuqIw1eSDjH8Zf//8jKA//+a7GA=
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 18:29:38 +0000
Message-ID: <BYAPR11MB3544E8CB37D8763C8A25BD60D0340@BYAPR11MB3544.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00c901d500e8$de7722e0$9b6568a0$@ndzh.com> <123572E6-EBA5-45CD-BD25-15E363512EED@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <123572E6-EBA5-45CD-BD25-15E363512EED@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kmajumda@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:30d:1254:95a8:f1e1:1cdf:75e6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 20bc7703-de50-43bc-dbb3-08d6cf2c2265
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600141)(711020)(4605104)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR11MB3735;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR11MB3735:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR11MB3735FCB3DF459A339920B4C2D0340@BYAPR11MB3735.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0025434D2D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(396003)(376002)(346002)(136003)(39860400002)(366004)(199004)(189003)(256004)(11346002)(110136005)(186003)(446003)(2501003)(5660300002)(7736002)(25786009)(476003)(54906003)(486006)(73956011)(229853002)(99286004)(52536014)(33656002)(102836004)(14454004)(66946007)(76116006)(53546011)(6506007)(66446008)(64756008)(66556008)(66476007)(4326008)(76176011)(9686003)(86362001)(966005)(236005)(8936002)(55016002)(53936002)(6306002)(54896002)(107886003)(316002)(2906002)(6246003)(68736007)(478600001)(7696005)(71190400001)(71200400001)(81156014)(6116002)(790700001)(6436002)(606006)(46003)(81166006)(8676002)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR11MB3735; H:BYAPR11MB3544.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 736P4ykbN/kYLg/2e+/Hn4C/kQyPy8u9zgdwey7Ef90Kx/KGrjoDnRlv4TKoY2R42iWj3z2lCz8OV1+Hzry9VrZT5Gj1hA/RjlhcoXu22vWZVNaA76RxaMXhFB/CIPS5NCWyHSVJyZOrxcK6cmyMnUwEipQahw6sMmbc2vfaD6mprf0QvJs7Mg5GoI6RcsOYgBylOPTLnFLojs8ARS4dZNWgcEP+qNCMFbrZkJOmXHv1hU4HonX0FHS3tWAx43My2vZoMK9ZgeyAT+RXJQ3CCEaFqRiB+5iJohQwlHOUrJ5mSYXK9HDV5HsQnqOLt1dfALs2on0X1HW6jgw3pPtNuqTtVXmdmSnf9wLtnMqLq60z/dxei1nqrcG+FMEpk1EM/asAzCjtjh37H5m3VIPZWaSuN43Zg7fkxqpvehXJL/c=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BYAPR11MB3544E8CB37D8763C8A25BD60D0340BYAPR11MB3544namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 20bc7703-de50-43bc-dbb3-08d6cf2c2265
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 May 2019 18:29:38.0574 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR11MB3735
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.26, xch-aln-016.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-9.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/bq-lY8uPNH4-Rmmwc08ZYqPE7l0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 May 2019 18:29:47 -0000

Hi Susan/all,

Support for WG adoption and concur with Zafar’s comment below.

Regards,
Kausik

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Zafar Ali (zali)
Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2019 9:24 AM
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>; idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org; Zafar Ali (zali) <zali@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

Hi Susan and the WG,

Support!

More in-line.

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 9:14 AM
To: "idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Cc: "draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org<mailto:draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org>" <draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org<mailto:draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018]

This begins a 2 week WG Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext/

Please consider the following questions in commenting on the


  1.  Does this draft needed support for the SRV6?

Yes


  1.  Is this draft a good starting point for the BGP support for SRv6?

Yes


  1.  Do you know of any technical issues regarding this draft?

If so, do these technical issues present any major problems to the technical solution?



No



  1.  Do you know of any existing implementations or any plans for implementation?

Yes

One special note, if you mentioning technical issues regarding a draft it can be helpful to the WG.  Our goal is to provide good BGP support of the Spring BGP-LS work in a timely fashion.  The SRv6 support is key to the Spring effort – so it would be helpful to mention and get resolved any issues with this draft.

Cheerily, Sue Hares