Re: [Idr] IDR WG Charter (Re: Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018])

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Fri, 07 June 2019 16:44 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26E112010E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:44:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nBalg1Awf_eF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com (mail-qt1-x82a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A103120026 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id x47so2979267qtk.11 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S0flVMq/oKTmLmDfJsQW4fd7KZN3Wut5JUaK2v3eLYc=; b=XA/MEG51faIuPM5jgsMuRl79bcS9FCLJlKHF6D0+4DQYNxNfQt2MT8Uao66ppkoHh1 2QkaZZ4EoIxBu7a8HZz2Z/c3D4i7tU9RSdTZdYKFcLoh2YQFot1bShrdMTRVIPM/t1qc 0iVaI6rXce/yIEr/N2xAVtZQEyrzteIOc9vDOQQmFYjPake7XQbPTsncoELfQyOBLEvu VpjNCL+smOXTWCUbCwcaz/8oqD328yo+ZyG2pFN/UYZfFvo3/+16uXROS2uaDfqNq2Yc pkXvnQQb4d1jqUDrk7+Eo9spBo4BqahPxK02z9+pNguBsDkPvCsRGxr4zuuhfIFi/sO9 Wa3w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S0flVMq/oKTmLmDfJsQW4fd7KZN3Wut5JUaK2v3eLYc=; b=Pj3ON5jr52/2m3QZz/e0qMTO2WX4/Kx9klgUvNhpnFmQxNl2k2m7cCNl1tuAo1dHLk BIinHo4RSEwe6vZFVysIOi04w88XrA9XJ71f5fAveYfp35N3rRKMwCUnWqOYqCxwG+TS svdA5rdZHe/hqH4E+Yzaz4rDQROAYDHMS7N2g6fyj8JGayUxHlx1dQAeeD/VVuickvvv duwHMpWQie4wYxxvKrGUhGkW0J6HZp+qLmZzBvj1YpVa/WSoh+aJGv1p13/g+WFrWtg9 sXRyGxua9tXJX93OyldxH1nvQFYIMN30+pcXg3lmE0Ef0YhTBJi+9M4YYToPdi1IZ+9u 8w2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVSFGBtuenCGS6isI/sbxEavmGhtemXBfPx56PRHnE+ax6eLVkK znK1jb9CRjJWp6Rz97teWmSBhnRrwkXZ6j+xx45jUw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzwCgQT9PFAAgWml7N0TxSrSOWCt1zC09EiIgds75OUdBaB1Mn8ORuxG8OeUCPDe4bfKcC83nbrR7ModMJkw5A=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9ac8:: with SMTP id k8mr44690572qvf.159.1559925867999; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <01ce01d5167f$d263a120$772ae360$@ndzh.com> <DM5PR11MB202720F61953C224DB081498C1140@DM5PR11MB2027.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <02cf01d51ab1$052bfc80$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <004201d51abd$498a5000$dc9ef000$@ndzh.com> <CAOj+MMEnyT1sOX9fWbDR4PV4goBZerdF6ykKUbZ2t3YDRyAHfg@mail.gmail.com> <005301d51ac3$4b6e6a90$e24b3fb0$@ndzh.com> <CAOj+MMHV0G_O9p7F0UPHXUtzz6HWSiVa5EsLosZu3Q7U_Gr32A@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsyKX3KwbgFVb6v2jzWixn6nJLrBZezdQMpxNH4ExvzTYQ@mail.gmail.com> <08F80367-B5B7-408F-94CA-E76D652B144C@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <08F80367-B5B7-408F-94CA-E76D652B144C@juniper.net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 18:44:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMHRVLaJLHv9fVG0HW9BkS5FDCwHyVDdh_Hn8P=wgPtxdA@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, "<rtg-ads@ietf.org>" <rtg-ads@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, rtgwg-chairs <rtgwg-chairs@ietf.org>, Hares Susan <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003d06b1058abe8b26"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3x8Bnx8GObB-Grqik-q4SqepGvM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR WG Charter (Re: Adoption call for draft-dawra-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext [5/2 - 5/16/2018])
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:44:31 -0000

> My hope is this will reduce overhead for all concerned.

While clearly it may reduce the IDR WG work overhead in the same time
aren't we worried that it may generate uncontrolled overhead of the
protocol itself ?

Thx,
R.


On Fri, Jun 7, 2019 at 5:27 PM John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

> On Jun 5, 2019, at 8:43 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have also had the conversation with the Chairs about the load that
> BGP-LS represents to idr and the general topic of information transport
> (note that BGP is not the only protocol in the Routing Area being used to
> transport stuff…so it is a much wider topic).  The last time was a few
> months ago.  I don’t remember having the discussion on the list.
>
> At that time, the general consensus (between the Chairs and me) was that
> the operation of BGP-LS should be maintained in idr (it is BGP!).
>
> One further outcome of that discussion was that we agreed that LSR would
> include a BGP-LS encoding when progressing uncomplicated drafts that
> already contain OSPF and IS-IS encodings. We reported this to the WG at our
> meeting and it’s come up on the mailing list since then. My hope is this
> will reduce overhead for all concerned.
>
> —John
>
>