IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 09 April 2024 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF935C14F6EC for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fHANhmSm2Ypm for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from quail.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (quail.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.151]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361C4C14F610 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F2542D0B for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 22:08:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C91E143C28 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 22:08:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Harbor-Hysterical: 0dade51a451e03e0_1712700506130_1474577834
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1712700506130:3322916777
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1712700506129
Received: from uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io (uk-fast-smtpout1.hostinger.io [31.220.23.35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.113.47.166 (trex/6.9.2); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:08:26 +0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------Mm75vPdDduXuEJvsXCTIRUli"
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1712700504; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=IbSZ8V0CQH0ChJ/aEH7BHqZT3dzPdKpSw4Karz3wTfg=; b=YcBajiDcBSHKTjJzoc5tGuNKSaR48+DfUtqazAQNfiD2fiwLOvT24tFFFA4PtMReZiGiKm DZbaCF4cvXZNH58OPnsEolG2zrxaDEfWkj8QQBsfCtU3Wkapx2h4aKtpWfN7qToKHnelPi VGn63RUSCUIvx4EHK4O6T9rEGlmh7z/ClhbFz28fzPV3Bj3/qnvOa+WJxZmXUqlPgy850S H9ZR6Xj1Vv7z+oIQOBsSREPg2C3G/9RB++Jhi2fFQ22jLC+JfldSmJsHBR3FIci3MNOlzB hFhmj0L0+StNghxnrL38e9JuSa/oESGCn6+HcdWVPfkRHjLEG7gPCK8S9SCLdQ==
Message-ID: <fc94f6b6-5528-4327-9971-ce2666c12233@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:08:22 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Language: en-US
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>, ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw9wHUSsWYBzXL=a5GZ9V5d6z0jHFVRTw7a15V1PaT5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6Sw9wHUSsWYBzXL=a5GZ9V5d6z0jHFVRTw7a15V1PaT5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=SrCW6uO0 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6615bc58 a=f+oD5hTMMv8HtluUlp4ziA==:117 a=f+oD5hTMMv8HtluUlp4ziA==:17 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=JqEG_dyiAAAA:8 a=8pif782wAAAA:8 a=k7Ga1wGzAAAA:8 a=l7wv7TVFUsSb6hRQhRwA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=rKiBpLyjyOhNJaYALi0A:9 a=0foS_DW5cSczSeBZ:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=lqcHg5cX4UMA:10 a=s_KHD6aHcoUgXWm27CaZ:22 a=ijMaxGghyylP-n2pFjDB:22
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfKrQFH+JaRD/+88xDE7EUECIgvbFXhoUdhRtxnws4z6ONLpTDA081CfcPSPp8hspiBf+oBbUPPfCsPHPvF7KSMJPiqIMLqR07lmx2V9xFR0ejSFGWO+j k++QEimk+lfpTDFu1ZU+pBxmdTcVEUvRg03m6Ct7vJJcGwRtO6Vo9ahEgo1Ts/M2B6NEo2sb/Up02aq6jRfQRIojhPqQtkDdfcs=
X-AuthUser: dhc@dcrocker.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/1nfFg7NDEQYcd8oiPPSb5Ff2OQo>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:08:32 -0000

On 4/9/2024 2:24 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> Even the AP updated this one. It took me a while to find a 
> non-paywalled reference:
>
> https://twitter.com/APStylebook/status/1022106915000778754

If the presence of the s had no established usage or were confusing, 
there might be a solid basis for worrying about it, but the s continues 
to be used in public discourse:

Emoji - Wikipedia <#>

🔗 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji 
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emoji>

  d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email