Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 09 April 2024 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FC5C14F610 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwMtmNNQMycZ for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net (cross.elm.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.212.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D43C14F5E8 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:18:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE8842CF2 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:18:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fr-int-smtpout4.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2615C42DE2 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:18:23 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1712704704; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QKEG6P3HqCo2bo0NUrcT45LCQ0zFmiMX1k2gBtNos+66d6R6YB/N1NwKJt/1whtzJzuRO0 FUu2+J1oYQx/nYfHUxIcol6tePo7ARL00XZNRrkuRTAuaJbEuWifNlR9aILuE7aUiiu7/D 5Znc6xxxtKKvl1YoilK/yXQQ4hBQrTyLMr4bID3erCOq+gWxSyu1XO7q9S+s/7iEyxt7yk Q5Smvj1aRQr0jVKYt85IGezc6qTN9ivI50KLH5yfWIN+UpJk+lWQy+VkM6pqQhMeIaIOzq m0BnXUdpVatb4xldiSkFaR4SYmVv6nwmvrb6gHPgmlXCaGh0L/9gxVkoNHftpQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1712704704; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=fnvtLfWGqLZAqgk1XfDctgKfbokaGIa3dxLR8wuB3nc=; b=xewLmPyuduOtrFptGOKnE5uQfiiSc6OTl/3EJt5uh7Ct1GkknJruZ7dEOag/9ZKVF5AgHl F/Fqgr2SOSBNzflmCkVBVetwUDd6KH8cNT+YjMg0K7m0QHPnUWPol2zIF/L9n5YeH0VRS3 WuR1znz1UoClGBY0vPmJgyastqsCmW8EBJkbiwI5f0iGVLXFfLPqSKDlWb3BcWDhAeabtp si06PRg0sbUuB/ftCx01J673mp0OM0jL1mVN9HtmoT+cAa7NmQkAXqnRGD8Dol9gaUcKSk ghtbvw06PcEggR6liO8NEAgMkdyIPEYixcbgLU2c6kGx6LrSRxLCRLCXTYGj/w==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-86f86f958-r6ncj; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authuser|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Tangy-Obese: 1a3afa4d243f68e0_1712704704666_3001903872
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1712704704666:2691451547
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1712704704666
Received: from fr-int-smtpout4.hostinger.io (fr-int-smtpout4.hostinger.io [89.116.146.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.121.196.237 (trex/6.9.2); Tue, 09 Apr 2024 23:18:24 +0000
Message-ID: <96f6589c-8e18-494e-b7d6-e91d21b30447@dcrocker.net>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1712704702; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fnvtLfWGqLZAqgk1XfDctgKfbokaGIa3dxLR8wuB3nc=; b=M3DcE0g1dk4RkRy4yNpJEzX/9L+KkGQ3oXxv80dZecPiA68fvKOoINelUXRqPSFFx98cqf RnfOEooikXyDUMEd73z9KEbV2MIii7gL+5giK5G/fLM+WMquBwNa26f5zyCRaW41SwmLnp h+0jtp6v9pcO2Zub21IjrwH9LgJZsXGez7hUfGPi6Keos2TbyoZvVBt9LvQkYUxUIn32EW 3Naig12UJc9VZ3RdsVXW29TzwwXCrNFI9q6JslDxbh0zxOxynoMbtXDg09bzuKmrwkDRhO SugLeZEUaH3b95rVX0PEx5u7irkUoFKM5M9TeXAbmaFe4sze4ldrVhf7qYLdLQ==
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:18:21 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw9wHUSsWYBzXL=a5GZ9V5d6z0jHFVRTw7a15V1PaT5-Q@mail.gmail.com> <fc94f6b6-5528-4327-9971-ce2666c12233@dcrocker.net> <CAChr6SyFVs-hjBob4SFCCocdxAY4eWxE7RuFgj9SdeA=U4kk5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SyFVs-hjBob4SFCCocdxAY4eWxE7RuFgj9SdeA=U4kk5g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CM-Envelope: MS4xfJf1+iULiHH4keq4bGCMj7hKUQP7PZFJwyddqu3IuVgOmOXIWkQxBLY4Wfqe1C9MGFNHlYYtM0LRX0gV/zlbNH05M2Dwa45UPBFgx8TI+2rYEbbAtJlT JBoosOXLey92IdQ7gCrAq6lOH5vekDsx7erQy30PE0AVmNimn87On6Kgj9foh6RsNysv5Du/QJIELa5bahucZOopq/KtBBsNz0M=
X-CM-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=ZKfRm27b c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6615ccbe a=f+oD5hTMMv8HtluUlp4ziA==:117 a=f+oD5hTMMv8HtluUlp4ziA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=k7Ga1wGzAAAA:8 a=KOyHWpaOfYpN2F5rmLcA:9 a=3ZKOabzyN94A:10 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=ijMaxGghyylP-n2pFjDB:22
X-AuthUser: dhc@dcrocker.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/CbqK2QxU2uDvlIeS1wiX900Icbg>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 23:18:31 -0000

On 4/9/2024 4:13 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> The point here is that "kanjis" is not really written in English, and 
> the same rules should apply to "emoji",

1. Why should the same rule apply?  Shared country of origin 
notwithstanding they have no common history of usage or similar semantics.

2. As already noted, established usage permits the s.

3. Having it does not affect utility or understanding of the ABNF.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
mast:@dcrocker@mastodon.social