IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 11 April 2024 18:01 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ADDC151075 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.037
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.037 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12=2.059, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MzcOXm7eurml for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x633.google.com (mail-ej1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 237ECC14F5F9 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x633.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a519ef3054bso8523266b.1 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712858510; x=1713463310; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=IgI+Ko/KARKLytguuahNkbKMpbibXbRMaf0RUlSZrGw=; b=RJAIJ037E1BKmGyQ3ucLlBxXY7KqYu9ZzgK/nUgJewLUXXzbUxLkcX0DALIZu+DrsH +MSPw1GTgkPj2f0TSMOOGMsUZBbuKJ2ykz4A4Qk/EDipF9oTrDGg2GjxvnJEGHQO2RLw r2UBdrEvrX3Ys3fcaVN60RNNjcLLKk1/PRI7b43IBDpex2ych/rOWqb4PsUMPCheB2Bc 8CFQWbDqerzVSOZ3gW5qshwxzPJ1SLVR7vcpVz4N7G3GWd2INK65cUDl5mlio2x+7G2J Qhsy18TCy9ryVimNRD9mqPFP5bkU7fZ36jZUCMTvQnuBZB4si9V2mkQ1AEX81+Gtte6G 8ssQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712858510; x=1713463310; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=IgI+Ko/KARKLytguuahNkbKMpbibXbRMaf0RUlSZrGw=; b=Helc6w1IWXEsTAJkzjktE7JIsDSgadFAYpx5XTFfm/uVOEjRk8pXZAJ/6AxmP7fxRP LDf0GXB2F0gs8O9m9dokLfOYFqaTcjIl5SEi5R5V2NH89UrzzVmPGhFDoIFN8kE85p7f aJLylFWqEOihbpPv+8GLZIIOi3fk0emrylF7nUT0FfPO3o/IjeQp/KPtuFpSx35mtjRR Fedhlp0GFJVR4NcJHdY+ygKWzhgFbq4f/3PgEldHyG3X/jL7LewGgG8BkL1vSH8vKjw0 XU3UIHmxceJM+XkYhC6q9JHKZl7a/feRD607x1fWVd9a7vRU/6YAgrV2+s539D+fPzNd 0Elg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU1OLg2R+2Mdp8tVhZD3lxP5mHT3nWHpFh4wfTq9vEjhnp4LnpF0tSu38gXLrwCCtaVIEpkkI9VYedOlLlRxq81Yg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzezkBB01C+tEDbf1UlwSdObn0vNzTjA63qUaAJZfMNJI74cJoP QukNR1oHBINBIuoz8AGmuKtF2kb58jcKtI+0kbROdviLpzH6kgAIjJmdFcDxkXP4K7j5PdwbZZp kh7q3+Tb71MIWooh0+IHYRwBoiwV970tApnw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFudZEw29vyCyDitIIZ2jGslMBErmiMbTq8M4rnmmKQfTDRwB4JlnVpIYtF9chnHZWvrM2cjQbdc9vBiAFp7jc=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1392:b0:a51:7a49:4a3a with SMTP id f18-20020a170906139200b00a517a494a3amr293485ejc.54.1712858509428; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SxeXVvysoQ2ymOtkD0aV4YbcekOcXE2617s4Bmr0GBeNA@mail.gmail.com> <bb4e790d-4d39-4499-a99c-f51bd938c3f4@tana.it> <CAChr6SyWKWYVj5=GdFayVGd4NStDxeg0tbj9HgN_vcPpAz3X8A@mail.gmail.com> <a109ec07-1691-4044-8100-92abd49ad78b@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <a109ec07-1691-4044-8100-92abd49ad78b@dcrocker.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 11:01:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxLrASSTMp0rL=AEtxRUiAB=qn5H0ft1Y_xMFJUw-AEmA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, ietf-822@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="0000000000000169060615d5f320"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/fGhppYOOkbE_lUqANrS-BXcfUgk>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 18:01:57 -0000

On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 9:35 AM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 4/11/2024 9:27 AM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> > There is already an existence proof, since GMail has this feature.
>
> MS Outlook has a reactions construct and even gateways the information
> back to authors with addressses outside of Outlook. It's does as just
> content, but makes clear they could adjust the gateway pretty easily, to
> support the Reaction RFC is they wanted to.
>

Just as a data point, I tried to react here, and got this alert from GMail
("You can't react to a message with a reply-to address")l:

[image: Screenshot 2024-04-11 at 10.58.51 AM.png]

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email