IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F0CC14F6FB for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ihKt-cxObRp1 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CC20C14F681 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 14:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a51beae2f13so402004066b.1 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:24:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712697864; x=1713302664; darn=ietf.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zzhvcHl5OwRTCSmNzr6eY3SJUiesh3nQ3/zuNEwmqD4=; b=FE/8ak10wXXV6b/wwnrG0xW2XDgfPE/UV9odfPc0M3okM2sUBrsSo/+LqHQ5fL0f5o v96N/hBJl0L/oY2fOnJQaOBnhJdd9YYGJNsTTNswZX9U39RacMe7Hbqgwjoaje2nP86E Ih+PcQYxg7toCSMxC2aJpNCnkg2t4p/HCsH0fJLZLzG9H9FhrsLPa+T0x7fRAOsrJD0C 77HL1oARjB+EbAaTT5UOFx1wU9whdA7TFujgdyDTFWJSp0USuPO2xU8qyfSVdVSGjBln z2dnHMZda7LqlMfY75A65UHcwRwzr6jl2iHIyt+F5hnKadlvYYdtHLEeR61s+5l+YY/d +NEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712697864; x=1713302664; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=zzhvcHl5OwRTCSmNzr6eY3SJUiesh3nQ3/zuNEwmqD4=; b=lV2VKzlJxpBU79CjFNx+cn5dDjr37AHfC+9wpiWHoARgaZuYRb7L+T41/96kugoN/G 6ouPg8V8SFT8EE5GetoeMzU0R3Ic4hlKjto+iHEgv4Gd04RaTn3AOCZuRm82XfhiqhMv H8dGkhOKVZ+whiOJVs0bQXhQp1kSOf+y50mjMGv/d/b/3t0PrrOm7b+KLi3qPoYFco/T MZQifTaJQaN9MKNai63fvDaBeVQA2AYAyWeA4q2WyEy2hlKlodlvWilZTwYBlcQ1qnWU +alDyF4Yn9Qm3R2tvj0M4HAsFa/VJwYBzL+QoM8V+qy8b/8fNYf4/tEwkynKTbgqV8w4 D94A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwQuqXwkLfyLfAcQFwmJHJjZkIXxXGOmtMVZkKZRXfRJLYDBt8X ucKho8cdoLWJAnUO4Ut8gDP1ZNHuDURgj7CzD7jIBwsEWEheWETYCD23L1sXIZPkF9+kF8EqSse YiNCUPF5a+pOe8+a/5OZwRmNnAlnVMTy3NVxMoAbi
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGGD9lf/yRWAac3hNsRILw+ihv1XKLn4RnvUoZ25djLdx8lKOuDP3u8UOvxsXctlEH800GVLwYBCswuK/8KZEM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:980f:b0:a51:c747:531d with SMTP id ji15-20020a170907980f00b00a51c747531dmr488588ejc.64.1712697864498; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 14:24:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sw9wHUSsWYBzXL=a5GZ9V5d6z0jHFVRTw7a15V1PaT5-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d239c30615b08b7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/v8dnklyhNs-4fD9kRDumsQMzF9U>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 21:24:27 -0000

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 2:01 PM Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> wrote:

> A smaller issue is the ABNF production called "base-emojis". Pluralizing
> "emoji" that way is ok according to most English dictionaries, but I think
> it's better to leave off the "s" for a worldwide standard (for example, you
> can't add an "s" to "kanji").*
>

Even the AP updated this one. It took me a while to find a non-paywalled
reference:

https://twitter.com/APStylebook/status/1022106915000778754

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email