Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 23:14 UTC
Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2E8CC14F6E1 for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4ImK5u5C1Q4F for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BCE0C14F6AE for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a519e1b0e2dso634582366b.2 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712704447; x=1713309247; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=R6W+G/jKGfEfbsma90CeWXvhbIMeuarBwonzpkMa/tw=; b=LXi1cs5gc5LB2pQOGe/G3dS55zTzVned2s0qbJHwxGfYlsf92oe5iwWhMfxyQ9Z9Gc YWGUYVQ6BBjvicMcbS3BmeyczPJLKkxogGfbwSq/2v7dItEEIWADnOVnza46ccNo6GH5 rjSFhRtBJrZRXGnv5y0XDYmvMYEd/Zr/Y4BJby+bDRhuEdFLFvMzZUGMZwSE7nq2RMK6 7/dEpdTvPTO2YJR/Mqm0vmi8YAujhFZCNs9JujBq1m6e/uqO8sbxgu2rWwH2w+5QRGLz gMtxDXqUxpdQ1XOwNZu1l/tu6ZkgyQiqpyfHK0XThaXsUJM/k1W+q7yHN3djN29GPjyR dhDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712704447; x=1713309247; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=R6W+G/jKGfEfbsma90CeWXvhbIMeuarBwonzpkMa/tw=; b=eP8v7uhKzsHitN5dNqR36NTEpMQiCjvA3/L6+Jl32XxlzBHXOu/iFUaZHrmuJokRnD /GpR9ZLY+H7VtzdHy+tNuBJPBKrseXsm1MIbUlm3oa8j0W4s7IG4+uGqginV7oht1ICv /HUmX3kTgbPLcZuf29qXhFvjl3ofaapWFgyNo15/YO96V2pTrrPKyuD91y4c6VvJimBg PNQMn10ROWsdCim7tVLHOz4XAGsuXnrxNmTXe/ql0hN6n53Bw/aL2TUe1bbMrKNNhTrn 15uIj6CgnSPM698u2ugawOFNE+IkdUuwcUfKTkt5EbAH0V137HdcVC3S5TjfOP12Wr5J zGmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAotMijliHU3ePFPiCCyDecRK3pzUOZd1Ufloqwf8jdgeVhbcL H+3Yu7b5nj16XS3yu3EFqeT42R/J+dNg7J7CVIgc7uGdTz9uB1Js5QSv4p1yKHPKiheLptTgwhe WpUJYGd4U3TFvtfQH261NiJdnT2IqqJ3g8+jDYxgq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGn2m18t1iB0e8aw7h75OOVcAVzbhSMRVlfMX/sCKST0lvcnUjxLgoFwl6v2mHmwU0wM2LZ4cyhgptEoJKoyes=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:968b:b0:a51:d235:74cf with SMTP id hd11-20020a170907968b00b00a51d23574cfmr817452ejc.38.1712704447217; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:14:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw9wHUSsWYBzXL=a5GZ9V5d6z0jHFVRTw7a15V1PaT5-Q@mail.gmail.com> <fc94f6b6-5528-4327-9971-ce2666c12233@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <fc94f6b6-5528-4327-9971-ce2666c12233@dcrocker.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 16:13:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SyFVs-hjBob4SFCCocdxAY4eWxE7RuFgj9SdeA=U4kk5g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e8bcf0615b21477"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/OhxFMHmmaRu4GwzNxweDju1fWhE>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 23:14:10 -0000
On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 3:08 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote: > On 4/9/2024 2:24 PM, Rob Sayre wrote: > > Even the AP updated this one. It took me a while to find a non-paywalled > reference: > > https://twitter.com/APStylebook/status/1022106915000778754 > > If the presence of the s had no established usage or were confusing, there > might be a solid basis for worrying about it, but the s continues to be > used in public discourse: > It's not a hill I would die on, but let me explain the reasoning. I think it's also the reason for the AP change. kanji: 漢字 emoji: 絵文字 where 字 means "character". The 漢 in the first means "Han" and the "絵文" in second means "pictograph" or "picture text". These are some of the few Japanese things I know, aside from English-Japanese slang like "down desu" (I'm down, meaning I agree with the plan). The point here is that "kanjis" is not really written in English, and the same rules should apply to "emoji", at least as a style point. I agree that it's not technically wrong according to the dictionary, but I think it would sound like something extra, akin to "the Google", to many people. thanks, Rob
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Dave Crocker
- Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summ… Rob Sayre