IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Tue, 09 April 2024 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29014C14F5FD for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:41:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ThndpMfIa1HB for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D71BC14F5F5 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 15:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a44ad785a44so720158666b.3 for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:41:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712702464; x=1713307264; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0PEaQ9LmtPsdtmVRu0RDC/yIt55ABoEjyUDNCJSlf+Y=; b=UzEvFP95SvjJ9TNXPitNre9cxYgO8t2fidhniZTBLbjocpKSXxjWRp9kXhBwuuWfFa AbXk9UDyQ9ZflQPOyjxVjKVLFsygaQzsoW9CwDrbBTxR6/gOst1FU4ikepqIiIQ2nX7L gqqHCC0pEUxkPvjN65JPY/QXvoTpAvOYyhAraARRnWa2Cu8TXIcRc1AFFjDdLC2Fy31j iSvGy7psrR0X19QINBp2NaSoctTZh/4pGR9xETP/vbMwJDR6bvOZj1KcovB6WM0AXtfL 0wMyW/Uv6UFhR3aQ1wHA19U1M7Ib8nbNCXGM6CxWRdDSmDhh9nkfUv8st7tA0UeO+XYo FIrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712702464; x=1713307264; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0PEaQ9LmtPsdtmVRu0RDC/yIt55ABoEjyUDNCJSlf+Y=; b=Vk3AW++8sXwZXDPFyAiriiVeFScYFQLQUFI2QL//PaitR6UCmU5MIuznBbfnQQp1nA z0JmBwJw2DNB9F8HDuS8tsKZ37XfGWFavW84f/k2tn9+l6ZZnBU4YHrI9G5U/H53wIeO DaCAvJ4fa3sRIUfsm9Rd9ytlFE1mM12y3M6w2dHYKrQq4SVNlNKBkiJnlbnEhXudgTJc OGe7i/7e8KmOVtGFJCqh81bjP7eMAvohHXlY62eNwfO6cinXjKmG6Jzep/2UNq0Ur8tI 9ucWBOZHEWowwQlShTI0yHZ01lcBCoDHr/cgwsGNW0OYQwRGsiRdhWsXownv2bQFJfEh Xr0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwV73yInrAv+JCzcpHKO+M51+k6qfejDKBS0hqFddwtQ40/4cp0 uQfYFHf+4r8qW19UD8bNi8J/XGVacND8b0EZeDnzpYbsabdAgmUYndnDhmOvpTABChMKz6NSpKC KlAW4ost0MqImbFEoqUTzsunSXGhIuHwY/VOrUDzu
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF3g45Mlp+uT8k/bC+11N5Eev8kuvX8PGK5VRcD2III8Ejfa5TrEAeP1KO0gklrKDzRgrsfoAS2gUphXwO5YRY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:248f:b0:a51:d5ce:b79e with SMTP id e15-20020a170906248f00b00a51d5ceb79emr453987ejb.47.1712702464301; Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:41:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com> <6cb61e9f-1270-4dc8-a058-7de313dbbe3c@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <6cb61e9f-1270-4dc8-a058-7de313dbbe3c@dcrocker.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 15:40:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SwU2T7fm2M5kG3jJQYzpaEXJGXGX8OA+0n_40oruSO--g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Cc: ietf-822@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fda5d50615b19d81"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/yasvtcEa4okQi7jDudf8bycjk8s>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:41:10 -0000

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 3:05 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:

> On 4/9/2024 2:01 PM, Rob Sayre wrote:
> > I thought of this draft today because the feature was requested:
> >
> > https://www.threads.net/@anildash/post/C5jMbA2OruN
>
> thanks for including the RFC reference to that thread.
>
>
> >
> > I noticed a few problems that might inhibit adoption.
> >
> > I think the base set should include ⭐ and ♥️. One of these two can be
> > found in GMail and most social media apps.
>
> There are different preferred subsets, across different systems that use
> emojis in an integrated way.  So there is not single, perfect choice.
>

Yes, but you really need those two. The problem with current base emoji is
that the only generic positive signal is 👍. This one doesn't work that
well anymore, and is often seen as sarcastic.

So if I reply: 👍

that can be seen as "sure, man".

thanks,
Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email