IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Wed, 10 April 2024 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6F6C14CEFE for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3qe8EgkBXoVY for <ietf-822@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [94.198.96.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51BE6C14F61E for <ietf-822@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 02:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1712741542; bh=OhSV6ks2/QUT/yj9A8cQREHEFQIp2aRaA4B2JIhN/9Q=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=DNxPaSkTBDHrHA24O774RAKZMq8TtKh3MVY9wBjYNY+8xHZ8p6sdt5QI9FdEVHhZx f826UrCxYDLZSVO7etDf17cMgCJYuG9So5zRogWpTHuITzk0PngS2ZhuQ7Hirw7q7x BvTuDIbiOJE+T4SneD2UvwAO98Ht2XGkwCjYRak+K69OBNtEztqnzk9wastym
Original-Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [172.25.197.120] (pcale.tana [::ffff:172.25.197.120]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC0EB.0000000066165CA5.000006FF; Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:32:21 +0200
Message-ID: <b7d456f9-da3c-4113-8b07-82ef769a3d15@tana.it>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 11:32:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: ietf-822@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Content-Language: en-US, it-IT
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwVPb7nX-8bmoPtTGuuW1jHoKnMkiwcrLQhi5_avPCxoA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-822/XlS9nAM3mNY-PGBTI1CJ_Ku6rT8>
Subject: Re: [ietf-822] RFC 9078 Reaction: Indicating Summary Reaction to a Message
X-BeenThere: ietf-822@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of issues related to Internet Message Format \[RFC 822, RFC 2822, RFC 5322\]" <ietf-822.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf-822/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-822@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-822>, <mailto:ietf-822-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:32:33 -0000

On Tue 09/Apr/2024 23:01:30 +0200 Rob Sayre wrote:
> 
> I thought of this draft today because the feature was requested:
> 
> https://www.threads.net/@anildash/post/C5jMbA2OruN


Anil Dash talked about "starring" an email.  That is the IMAP \Flagged 
attribute, designed "for urgent/special attention" in RFC 3501.  Although 
keywords were introduced in the same RFC, they arrived later.  Mail clients now 
provide lots of tags, many of which don't appear in the IANA registry.

Rob, would you use the oldish star or invent a new tag, perhaps a different tag 
for each different reaction?

Just curious.


Best
Ale
--

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status