IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

"Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <julienl@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E414E3A6B00; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.577
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0h8BfzwjJSbt; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4463A6B2F; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=julienl@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1284492257; x=1316028257; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; z=From:=20"Laganier,=20Julien"=20<julienl@qualcomm.com> |To:=20Behcet=20Sarikaya=20<sarikaya@ieee.org>,=20Alexand ru=20Petrescu=0D=0A=09<alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>|CC: =20IETF=20Discussion=20<ietf@ietf.org>,=20mext=20<mext@ie tf.org>|Date:=20Tue,=2014=20Sep=202010=2012:23:44=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[MEXT]=20Last=20Call:=20draft-ietf-mext -nemo-pd=20(DHCPv6=20Prefix=0D=0A=20Delegation=20for=20NE MO)=20to=20Proposed=20Standard|Thread-Topic:=20[MEXT]=20L ast=20Call:=20draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd=20(DHCPv6=20Prefix =0D=0A=20Delegation=20for=20NEMO)=20to=20Proposed=20Stand ard|Thread-Index:=20ActUJhuUGJbkLk2XSXSjHwCE9RFUhAABhYPA |Message-ID:=20<BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E51 A@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>|References:=20<C8B03E68.14 FA4%hesham@elevatemobile.com>=0D=0A=20<4C8A1DEF.9050403@g mail.com>=0D=0A=20<BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826 E30A@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>=0D=0A=20<165516.11213.q m@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>=0D=0A=20<BF345F63074F8040 B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E435@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> =0D=0A=20<453079.96171.qm@web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> |In-Reply-To:=20<453079.96171.qm@web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo .com>|Accept-Language:=20en-US|Content-Language:=20en-US |X-MS-Has-Attach:|X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage: =20en-US|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-as cii"|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0; bh=B9qz3dSDAkknXHnph47oZKmhO0GAz6Qdo3qbseip5qk=; b=kEY0+zRm4J8m8QJTZDapy7sHPa/MORSmsBILhaIKih/KecbxqrxNfV/d ynULpU+ovoMI67Z0z5Y2yTgrJxSQ/dquUynaPOC3LU1zNq23LW/PTsX3F X1mwSvRYX8c4NgmhUPn0coQqKn8pX6Ad+Cs3lUwpxUMNq35jr2F854W2D c=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6106"; a="54330618"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 14 Sep 2010 12:23:47 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,365,1280732400"; d="scan'208";a="85640208"
Received: from nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com ([10.46.93.98]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 14 Sep 2010 12:23:47 -0700
Received: from nalasexhc01.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.129.185) by nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:23:46 -0700
Received: from NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.7.118]) by nalasexhc01.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.129.185]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:23:46 -0700
From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:23:44 -0700
Subject: RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: ActUJhuUGJbkLk2XSXSjHwCE9RFUhAABhYPA
Message-ID: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E51A@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <C8B03E68.14FA4%hesham@elevatemobile.com> <4C8A1DEF.9050403@gmail.com> <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E30A@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <165516.11213.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E435@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <453079.96171.qm@web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <453079.96171.qm@web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, mext <mext@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 19:24:24 -0000

Behcet Sarikaya wrote: 
> 
> Laganier, Julien wrote:
> >
> > Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > >
> > > Laganier, Julien wrote:
> > >  >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > [ I also note that this draft  has been more than 2 years in the
> > > >  MEXT working group  in which you are participating, which gave you
> > > >  ample time to comment on this and other things...  ]
> > >
> > > Julien: Alex,  myself, possibly others have been raising issues
> > > with this draft since  long time.
> >
> > ... during which there was no consensus that there is an issue  to be
> > addressed by the MEXT WG.
> >
> 
> 
> I am curious on this. If someone raises an issue during WGLC or IETF LC,
> 
> do we go back to the WG and ask if there is consensus on this issue?
> 
> I'll appreciate clarification for my education.

Good education usually involves one doing his/her homework:

<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2418>

--julien

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email