Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

[Wassim Haddad <[e-mail]>]

On Sep 11, 2010, at 5:22 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:

> Le 11/09/2010 08:13, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/09/10 12:34 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu"<[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Le 10/09/2010 14:12, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> When it is away from home it is fully a Host on the egress
>>>>> interface. When at home fully Router on same.  I am happy with it
>>>>> this way.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> =>   Ok that doesn't make any sense to me.
>>> 
>>> Well, let me rephrase as the RFC text puts it: when the MR is at home it
>>> joins the all-routers multicast address, otherwise it joins the
>>> all-hosts address.  ND spec says similar.  Similarly, when MR at home it
>>> can send RAs on the egress, if away it MUST NOT send RAs on it.  It must
>>> always send RAs on the ingress.  This is to make sure MR doesn't break
>>> the Internet routing.
>>> 
>>> Does this sound better?
>> 
>> =>  I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this
>> problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC
>> says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how
>> else you can solve it _here_.
> 
> I am open to solve it here and I have suggestion :
> 
> - make DHCPv6-PD-NEMO assign a default route to the Mobile Router at
>   home.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> I also followed advice and went asking to DHC WG.  I got redirected to 
> MIF soon-Charter DHCP options route table, and got mentioned 
> draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router req W-3 talking DHCPv6-PD and default 
> route.

=> Then we better wait for this draft to move forward. 


Regards,

Wassim H.