Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

[Hesham Soliman <[e-mail]>]

On 10/09/10 7:55 PM, "Alexandru Petrescu" <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Le 10/09/2010 11:48, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>> 
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> =>   Who cares, specify it in your product description. The IETF
>>>>  doesn't specify how to build products.
>>> 
>>> Hmm... to me it is a very IETF sensitive issue the Router vs Host.
>>> For example, an ND spec says distinctively what a Host and what a
>>> Router does, e.g. a Host does not respond to Router Solicitation.
>> 
>> =>  Yes and it does so on a per-interface basis, not on a
>> per-machine basis.
> 
> Yes, and the Mobile Router is a Router on its egress interface when
> connected at home, as per spec.  It is that interface that needs a
> default route automatically configured.

=> Ok, so you're happy with it being half host half router when it's away
from home? If so then let it do the same at home. Otherwise, I don't know
how you want to fix this in this WG.

Hesham