IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 12:12 UTC

Return-Path: <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B2A53A6B07; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zqBXrVJgJki1; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-1.servers.netregistry.net (smtp.netregistry.net [202.124.241.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367C13A6AF6; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [203.219.211.243] (helo=[192.168.0.6]) by smtp-1.servers.netregistry.net protocol: esmtpa (Exim 4.69 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ou2Sy-0001R4-6A; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:12:28 +1000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.26.0.100708
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:12:23 +1000
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
From: Hesham Soliman <hesham@elevatemobile.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <C8B05DC7.14FB7%hesham@elevatemobile.com>
Thread-Topic: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: ActQ4WyYicfxF4QCLEWrS2Y9G1xKBw==
In-Reply-To: <4C8A1DEF.9050403@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-User: hesham@elevatemobile.com
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:06:34 -0700
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, mext <mext@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 12:12:08 -0000

> 
> When it is away from home it is fully a Host on the egress interface.
> When at home fully Router on same.  I am happy with it this way.
> 

=> Ok that doesn't make any sense to me.

>> If so then let it do the same at home. Otherwise, I don't know how
>> you want to fix this in this WG.
> 
> It would mean to specify it to be a at home, be first a Host (get
> default route) then change and become a Router, but still at home.

=> Ditto.

Hesham

> 
> This behaviour could be set in the DHCPv6-PD-NEMO draft, being under
> discussion now.
> 
> Alex
> 
>> 
>> Hesham
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email