IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Tue, 14 September 2010 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7DE3A6986 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:01:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.302, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jG5Kmxqj22-o for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 29A5C3A6A06 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:01:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 96635 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Sep 2010 16:01:33 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1284480093; bh=qXL6Kcz5vq16Lz6dC82zjx6g/EOlZqqThnq37Zg8mw0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZA6rNem5KQYxDsWordTjKu+oMvGUDXv/R+owQNVWj1BZimelqnHxh68BoQxebZxH2X2Gl6X6/YKXlhVD9/4emuQEnSStrNupBE8z0ooWF39QlpqKd7FP6C1KHbr5045mzTdlwKzSJfAozCWCUbs8XxRbelknU7nA0sj2yL10VKA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dgLdlXjwOrgAxkb4e+SV99VSARinbOdRfOy0rQiOrSxNJn/Lwd7Ap9k5PZEezOrjS38Nkb39XFcv+7zevYxasvsXwBxKcv7CWavhiQfr0iHxxTRZOzo/kce4HQCIvFGBGrGvoE2Dz5W8Pev+zSCb654L660sth8H2KmvU1dhySM=;
Message-ID: <453079.96171.qm@web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: MuYv_RIVM1mA74LNdCjDT4KKAmzNDFD5MYf6E64_7TtrEO0 R_0XoeEEo0YiAepowDJdia4AxQ9EVWclscTUnMGq8NUSy.Ya0VWwKCIGsKf8 hmSmw5rxMR6aKoVZ7R26kI_md0cS5gtoxmfvv7O2km9nOfvi9mLk._5M_Gqw JZH0Wqg8.jeMrKY_sT5vkOxvLpyxXAmU4HegsQOD5WoA328M5WgnsXdSeiT2 VT4sDjUCQhSY0Rn0XtTTD7wu7K4VwfeqN3xxKtnFDKzEX0o1ub82i3rWUrKf KlWI.edqYUxH_kEzGkP0kXtzGPVcZmfvarjVEBFgxQlReuQAOx5lz1cUkByy o8S0lE_cZSTl_ZJqv59JjNybP7Q--
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111401.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:01:33 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/470 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950
References: <C8B03E68.14FA4%hesham@elevatemobile.com> <4C8A1DEF.9050403@gmail.com> <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E30A@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com> <165516.11213.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E435@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:01:33 -0700
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
To: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF345F63074F8040B58C00A186FCA57F1F6826E435@NALASEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, mext <mext@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:01:14 -0000

----- Original Message ----
> From: "Laganier, Julien" <julienl@qualcomm.com>
> To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>; Alexandru Petrescu 
><alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
> Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>; mext <mext@ietf.org>
> Sent: Mon, September 13, 2010 3:38:54 PM
> Subject: RE: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix 
>Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard
> 
> Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> > 
> > Laganier, Julien wrote:
> >  >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > [ I also note that this draft  has been more than 2 years in the  MEXT
> > >   working group  in which you are participating, which gave you ample time 
>to
> > >    comment on this and other things...  ]
> > 
> > Julien: Alex,  myself, possibly others have been raising issues with
> > this draft since  long time.
> 
> ... during which there was no consensus that there is an issue  to be addressed 
>by the MEXT WG. 
>


I am curious on this. If someone raises an issue during WGLC or IETF LC, 

do we go back to the WG and ask if there is consensus on this issue?

I'll appreciate clarification for my education.

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email