Re: Change in IPR policies

Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 03:22 UTC

Return-Path: <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA733A0E02; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J5q6XtC2KTGx; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B1343A0DFE; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id h95so287520pje.4; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:22:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DMisGRxTY4nFJvh5Yyf2LJTPQv7quXzEh1jLnUVBo2Y=; b=Ur9EvCaubkUtTAvNNEjPW/DrplqoNS/skaGnaMNlHCaU/w5fhx8srulpKJ2m3jU4Rv BjLsiz2ozvL2ItQTOqwWn9RBmwjnk33h8NcwfjsN3YAR8+Ozcy6OcF6yoaLgu+WqMr5F j1cRCL/NaE4IiZLBMK3ZPUR3dpoBz5zDkLSCi86fvJeSTFzR/vBJCqLy/BPxMwsu1AkA 7YxU61OrSm1XfKeCuM4Ts6aLWTA/N8dsu3E125eqX9sr3/VLgSqdwXRxZd1ss+Yc5c+C R9DaOZ7biXOiWluWOCdeXcQ5aIdfP7OeZ0A3C3FgO3YnWuAV2biS6OVYHmCBji7ejIJz VQtg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DMisGRxTY4nFJvh5Yyf2LJTPQv7quXzEh1jLnUVBo2Y=; b=XO7T2gkAACQzpI43Lfyc9kwTkmAxQ8JjCuJrbqnMA4Wo9q6H/lvSY5tRptyzUOF6gf 4ONSBcTgTEV138tUElsMcgS2zzZniaOCqQ8qSM8x1F27w5ghMsIZ3yE4g/2H1zCWv07+ vRutdOL7Czq5YcBnVjyagBu73c1/XuCAKRvdcWa2ZmkTyX5ilP+ZNexiv5h3xPKbkMdS pq9cYK/ynRW7QZQVeYDvx6a04oGxqaP2zwdw6IcV0IcKiWubK2cHAsIMUziLsYGAAw1H Mk2PAf2oWqbR0+1x06CB8nv5fZVZ5LtBgc62Bw7enq944L+3eqlGJyZnU1BsMjL2LX1W YuVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533VRuP1ZdfkORnWBElSML7Wm0aKg8hfhjaCssHzcIGXs2nlXAis j3/RNPXQVZxfr8t8D9PP9pnfK7sytvU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLUWt7ot11MB/WX/zhul3+6Rrp8QwmN6MCx0VjVv0wl1H/ZTntOO6EzVCk0FBLff/X+mN+FA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d086:: with SMTP id k6mr880821pju.133.1591759320253; Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.11] (c-73-63-232-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.63.232.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o1sm1835165pja.49.2020.06.09.20.21.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Jun 2020 20:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-25FCE261-68FE-4400-8AC5-748666287951
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeff Tantsura <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Change in IPR policies
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 20:21:58 -0700
Message-Id: <89D78740-BA42-4C95-8345-E073F07361DC@gmail.com>
References: <1729c36e9c0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
Cc: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <1729c36e9c0.277b.9b4188e636579690ba6c69f2c8a0f1fd@labn.net>
To: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/0frz9c_AJDIVyHC2eBl89dWt4G4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 03:22:03 -0000

+1 Lou!
Speaking as a working group chair, audio recordings are extremely useful tool when there’s a need to evaluate/ confirm some of the wg decisions. 

Regards,
Jeff

> On Jun 9, 2020, at 20:13, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Umm
> 
> 
> ----------
> On June 9, 2020 10:31:37 PM Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> ....
> > As the decision to drop the audio stream was based on a misunderstanding, ...
> >
> >
> 
> Independent of anything else, the audio steam should be reinstated until such time as the community agrees that it should be dropped.
> 
> Just my opinion as a frequent user of the steams and the audio recordings.
> 
> Lou