IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Change in IPR policies

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 10 June 2020 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838F63A0946 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:26:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HnS94qTN_opP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A56E03A094E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id n24so3080166ejd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:26:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=qvSoZE6iVd9Nd66u+PW4M5/YDgip4G/yPJqiVRJMXuI=; b=CeI1QxjHXSxzFwjyT82FPH2wLpKgxY8kfdpHz0ZLu7yXp/EQSntDS7BemhU59cqU5i lAOoUIpXNYREtbogypYbFImmvpJbJw3pornY1/1893wY6HwHGeP/KoXPEmtIehYHhMxi O5BkRBqRr7Q+45zcLnmfjHaLi/n9YqgyoHyV7zIV8qdg4AckcSFrERj9HbE49W+YQ8SO ZdcebX/RCwqWTJrZcJW8rcU171oxY2Yed70a4Xy7eHOG83aajJvghF2nmMsGwmDI9VHX onV+7xXRVQQoi6UoLyXzAC9pKpxF9DxGquPIIy7SJYdC/GzJn7qn50H4KdPPXDWUA6SE ANEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qvSoZE6iVd9Nd66u+PW4M5/YDgip4G/yPJqiVRJMXuI=; b=H5ayRy6bKyEpL7CUswOXxbJ7unAZzBTIsWQyp8P5JqR3ZCYp6qgQoS9bo41FC9ikkO 0ae8QLNtmBVL2BHpenx72A6JEIjWQ2+OrGAqE8jAoCiGgw5OqS9VD9WV9w5qB+NF6CIe 7MsmshPIxKFsxTzuIO5Wl4j67anV/3kQ+k/BMaGcMEWV1u04ZNOSUzm147yCQ3yscvju 7wXVJy5fBsZ7pRPs7Q9QGyg21vZt8CP5oiOM3UUJ0YYaR2k/yUD9ba08+M9CDDkmUFIF h9HjIVim1DAh6UworpNyxbOqdHnOm7PhYpHR/uHv93L37W/nGNdnRpMG1WPnoEntq0ag /0bQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5321zxpeL8T85ri4JcKkykusWAUH5HueQdVLyGP38Tzpbt8i3tqH IHwUGRuEIw5hnyqhVFgu6WP3l/iJCOwkaztBZyqSupVo
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkeuBZDsHw4spOHK3NqCaw4egqbqM3VMrwxOz8MjSwlots0cGhyXflL9PNUX2P2f4R5Hg6gDgTm5aJUI1E4NQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4989:: with SMTP id p9mr4028316eju.417.1591802806821; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <96A3BDFE6F7DC38D2366581F@PSB> <45F719DA-115A-40C7-B96F-7F2D06E33199@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <45F719DA-115A-40C7-B96F-7F2D06E33199@ietf.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:26:34 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMEPYscL0Ft4ZaLZHNvMjxY35E38fvFkyZ0h6W4N-QCp2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Change in IPR policies
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, trustees@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000da87ca05a7bc78d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3fuJ73kRHdueerO2osfItfzbE-w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 15:26:52 -0000

>
> I think the intent there was to restrict livestreaming and nothing else as
> the combination of live streaming + open jabber rooms would effectively
> allow participation without registration.  Once I’ve reviewed I will get
> that corrected.


Is this so ? I understand that IETF LLC wants to make money ... after all
Hollywood makes money for film makers too.

So if I do not pay I can not participate (meaning present or even ask
questions live), but why I can not even watch it live as passive user ?

I must wait some time after it ends to passively watch and start asking
questions on the mailing list ? Is there some other reason for such
rules other then squeeze more cash ?

Sorry but this all simply is not what IETF used to be. This is becoming
like a commercial institution with clear business objectives where
standards and IETF are becoming just elements to fill the bank accounts.

Rgs,
R.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email