Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

Michael Montemurro <montemurro.michael@gmail.com> Fri, 20 November 2009 00:38 UTC

Return-Path: <montemurro.michael@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B36E3A698F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7QdckuDZtJDr for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.27]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEA63A688D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so696844qwb.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D81DOleDFJkV/k8oHXVPrCSDBP1TI4shqrbJsWP1NfQ=; b=MBMcZQ5usVmEdceMyBN0y0hTPzjnJ5qFBC/O9/3lHvUocaE5dRrY1CDw3sQ5YkdW0M n50m5MHNSNAi5ddFn+bZuAi7Q2+7TcMtC1/nnM5Cef83SVVfqklO3BNPFt1nsUg4vuQ8 XYicOZQeN7PtB/LszuDgMlVABO6SBRe0kLjfQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=TNphBrRioWhNsmnMWh6V1iEq7eLX36lK3f9e+/z5xp+D71ZhFd06EpJrRELCNXp808 7rl88Ns3Ad8le8XjIxM1T6n/zZsly4/BlwyKRlJA9vAh9L9SQxK4UkNKClyVLqvmw9FC RN0U2FHWOuTVHgWbCKaG/8yp5xEcFht83f1Ik=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.229.116.140 with SMTP id m12mr107430qcq.54.1258677506956; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:38:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:38:26 -0500
Message-ID: <26140d940911191638y3ffdb6a4i3a199a5d1a14b6d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
From: Michael Montemurro <montemurro.michael@gmail.com>
To: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:38:33 -0000

Dear all,

I understand the community’s concerns regarding the timeliness of the
disclosure.  As I’m sure everyone can understand, as employees of
companies we are bound by confidentiality obligations and, in
addition, cannot always control our company’s internal processes.  The
community’s concerns have been brought to the attention of my employer
and they are in the process of evaluating the concerns.  My company
has asked for your patience while they take the time to evaluate the
concerns and determine if there is an appropriate course of action in
this matter to alleviate the concerns of the community.

Your understanding is appreciated.

Thanks,

Mike