Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 19 November 2009 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D4D3A68AF for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.669
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.669 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xR7SnxPk5q+h for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA783A6768 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:16:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [92.40.16.209] (92.40.16.209.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.16.209]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SwT-6QA7xQ0I@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:16:41 +0000
Message-ID: <4B04FEE9.5090507@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:16:41 +0900
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090303 SeaMonkey/1.1.15
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: RIM patents a URN (and ignores IETF IPR rules)
References: <F064CBF1-597E-493C-A8E2-0EAE1537659C@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F064CBF1-597E-493C-A8E2-0EAE1537659C@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:16:45 -0000

Cullen Jennings wrote:
>
> I'd like to draw peoples attention to the IPR disclosure
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/1213
>
> on
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-montemurro-gsma-imei-urn
>
> The associated patent seems to be
>
> http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=O7qXAAAAEBAJ
>
> Let me point out Mr. Allen is an author of both and a long time 
> participant in IETF. Seems the 00 draft was from Oct 2006, the patent 
> filed Jun 2005, and it seems we are just getting the IPR disclosure now.
I didn't have the time to study the patent/IPR disclosure yet. but ...
> Given there are many ways to solve this sort of problem, and many of 
> them are less likely to be IPR encumbered, I'd consider the 
> possibility that the IESG should send this to the DISPATCH WG to see 
> if they want to work on finding an appropriate solution to it. What do 
> other people think the IESG should do with this draft? 
Speaking as an individual participant: I would like for something like 
this to be standardized. Using DISPATCH WG what to do here seems like a 
fine idea.