RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 20 March 2006 20:11 UTC

Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060320150425.05da2740@vigilsec.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:09:28 -0500
To: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>, tls@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944046F6234@EUR-MSG-11.europe .corp.microsoft.com>
References: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944046F6234@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
Precedence: list
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

I need to add a point of information regarding "assisted" in the text 
below.  I insisted that the solution support multiple name forms and 
that the solution include a backward compatible mechanism as new name 
forms are registered.  I did offer some guidance during AD Review to 
ensure that these properties were included.

Russ

At 01:35 PM 3/20/2006, Stefan Santesson wrote:
><Stefan> We can't define a new user mapping type just to have one more.
>There has to be a use case with a need for one. The current hint can be
>used with a wide set of account names in practically any environment
>that use the principles of user@domain.
>
>But the extensibility is there in case a new need is there in the
>future.
>The security AD (Russ) has assisted in developing that part of the
>document.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Eric Rescorla
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Fenner
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re:… Dave Crocker
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Russ Allbery
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Strahm
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Dave Cridland
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Peter Dambier
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Pasi.Eronen
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Keith Moore
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Cridland
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Tony Finch
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Steven M. Bellovin
Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Gray, Eric
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Pasi.Eronen
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bernard Aboba
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Russ Housley
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Stefan Santesson
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Russ Housley
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Simon Josefsson
Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Jeffrey Hutzelman
RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Ari Medvinsky