RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Mon, 20 March 2006 20:11 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQjO-0004pH-SH; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:11:58 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQjN-0004p3-2R for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:11:57 -0500
Received: from woodstock.binhost.com ([144.202.243.4]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQjL-00012T-MK for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:11:56 -0500
Received: (qmail 23895 invoked by uid 0); 20 Mar 2006 20:11:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO Russ-Laptop.vigilsec.com) (130.129.134.249) by woodstock.binhost.com with SMTP; 20 Mar 2006 20:11:47 -0000
Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060320150425.05da2740@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:09:28 -0500
To: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>, tls@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944046F6234@EUR-MSG-11.europe .corp.microsoft.com>
References: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944046F6234@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
I need to add a point of information regarding "assisted" in the text below. I insisted that the solution support multiple name forms and that the solution include a backward compatible mechanism as new name forms are registered. I did offer some guidance during AD Review to ensure that these properties were included. Russ At 01:35 PM 3/20/2006, Stefan Santesson wrote: ><Stefan> We can't define a new user mapping type just to have one more. >There has to be a use case with a need for one. The current hint can be >used with a wide set of account names in practically any environment >that use the principles of user@domain. > >But the extensibility is there in case a new need is there in the >future. >The security AD (Russ) has assisted in developing that part of the >document. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Russ Allbery
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Strahm
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Peter Dambier
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Keith Moore
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Tony Finch
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Gray, Eric
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bernard Aboba
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Ari Medvinsky