RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
"Stefan Santesson" <stefans@microsoft.com> Mon, 20 March 2006 20:23 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQuO-0006N7-1G; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:23:20 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQuL-0006Mu-To; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:23:17 -0500
Received: from mail-eur.microsoft.com ([213.199.128.145]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FLQuK-0001rD-Km; Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:23:17 -0500
Received: from EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com ([65.53.193.196]) by mail-eur.microsoft.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:23:15 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 20:23:03 -0000
Message-ID: <BF9309599A71984CAC5BAC5ECA629944046F6284@EUR-MSG-11.europe.corp.microsoft.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
thread-index: AcZMWp+HLE3uNHToQRGxhj5eRJyT7gAADUDg
From: Stefan Santesson <stefans@microsoft.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, tls@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2006 20:23:15.0531 (UTC) FILETIME=[1E4701B0:01C64C5C]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Cc:
Subject: RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Russ, Thanks for that clarification. This is what I poorly was trying to communicate. Stefan Santesson Program Manager, Standards Liaison Windows Security > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:housley@vigilsec.com] > Sent: den 20 mars 2006 14:09 > To: Stefan Santesson; tls@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to > Proposed Standard > > I need to add a point of information regarding "assisted" in the text > below. I insisted that the solution support multiple name forms and > that the solution include a backward compatible mechanism as new name > forms are registered. I did offer some guidance during AD Review to > ensure that these properties were included. > > Russ > > > At 01:35 PM 3/20/2006, Stefan Santesson wrote: > ><Stefan> We can't define a new user mapping type just to have one more. > >There has to be a use case with a need for one. The current hint can be > >used with a wide set of account names in practically any environment > >that use the principles of user@domain. > > > >But the extensibility is there in case a new need is there in the > >future. > >The security AD (Russ) has assisted in developing that part of the > >document. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Fenner
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was: Re:… Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Russ Allbery
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bill Strahm
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? (was:… Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Peter Dambier
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Keith Moore
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Cridland
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Eric Rescorla
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Tony Finch
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: Is round-trip time no longer a concern? Dave Crocker
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Gray, Eric
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Pasi.Eronen
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Bernard Aboba
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Russ Housley
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Stefan Santesson
- RE: Re: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Ex… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extension' to Pr… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: [TLS] Re: Last Call: 'TLS User Mapping Extens… Ari Medvinsky