Re: How to get diversity of nominees was Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 26 January 2021 21:59 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E05153A1018 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:59:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KV9WQeXbfZ_1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20C7E3A100C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 10QLxkUI020191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Jan 2021 16:59:51 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:59:46 -0800
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: How to get diversity of nominees was Re: Diversity of candidates was Re: NomCom 2020 Announcement of Selections
Message-ID: <20210126215946.GE21@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <DM6PR02MB69249C1C01C2D89BE57184D1C3BC9@DM6PR02MB6924.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <49fd7888-8d44-11e3-0442-49ec0fadd751@network-heretics.com> <b7c11cf2-e06d-014b-ecd1-033175076859@joelhalpern.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <b7c11cf2-e06d-014b-ecd1-033175076859@joelhalpern.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3X5-t_D8w9vE-yTUX5BbP3Rn2p0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:59:55 -0000

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:53:38PM -0500, Joel Halpern wrote:
> There is one easy tool that I think we should use more in appointing WG 
> chairs.
> ADs could publicly ask for volunteers.

FWIW, I think we got about five responses to
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/0mfa1LhPnox6MtzhG76N_kVTMsY/ .
Response rates for targetted calls to individual WG lists vary, though.
I agree that it's a helpful thing to do.

-Ben