Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 05 March 2015 05:31 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7EB1AD35D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:31:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lAy7vCre-L9L for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C0451AD35B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.154] (unknown [120.149.147.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72A0522E265; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 00:31:49 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <600A7186-7454-4FF7-981E-B170A58F212C@frobbit.se>
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:31:46 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6F0EF3D8-7D27-4467-8619-B200633DA192@mnot.net>
References: <54C9DA42.5040901@cisco.com> <9EB44D8A-278B-42FC-A542-1C182AD43128@netnod.se> <A74A30F4D1214630918FD4CA@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <20150223153757.GI1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <20150223155241.GJ1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu> <2DF7230C-D1D8-4B21-9003-B336108A38CB@vpnc.org> <20150224172649.GX1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tslvbircj0d.fsf@mit.edu> <0325DF3F-17F3-4400-BDEA-EDB5334BF35C@frobbit.se> <20150225180227.GT1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <7AB921D35A7F9B23A53BD11A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tslvbip8io6.fsf@mit.edu> <54F09A35.9060506@qti.qualcomm.com> <54F78650.6070503@qti.qualcomm.com> <3FD8A0A3-5E71-483E-89FF-545120EE763C@mnot.net> <600A7186-7454-4FF7-981E-B170A58F212C@frobbit.se>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/48AwD01Gi_79HxqwbDocNZjH9TI>
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:31:59 -0000

Been there - no worries, and thanks.

Cheers,


> On 5 Mar 2015, at 4:29 pm, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:
> 
> All, specifically Mark,
> 
> This was a stupid editorial mistake by myself. It should have been replaced. So much for merging documents when being too tired 23:00 in the evening on the day the AD had given me a deadline... My apologies.
> 
> Pete, please let me know when you want a new version, -13.txt
> 
>   Patrik
> 
>> On 5 mar 2015, at 00:41, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Pete,
>> 
>> The example still uses a Web home page, even though this use of the URI record isn't specified nor used by any implementation I'm aware of (and even if there were one, it wouldn't be interoperable).
>> 
>> Changing to another example would fix this.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> 
>>> On 5 Mar 2015, at 9:25 am, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> [Explicitly Cc'ing folks who participated in the thread.]
>>> 
>>> On 2/27/15 10:24 AM, Pete Resnick wrote:
>>>> I'm going to ask Patrik to publish a revised ID at this point, which I expect to see in the next couple of days.
>>> 
>>> The new version of the document (-12) is out, announcement attached. It is now Informational, it removes the discussion of flag "D" for NAPTR, and adds a bit of discussion to security considerations. I would appreciate folks giving it a sniff and making sure it addresses your earlier concerns. If so, I'll go ahead and ballot it for the 12-March IESG telechat.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> pr
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
>>> Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478
>>> 
>> <Attached Message.eml>
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/