Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Fri, 06 March 2015 14:12 UTC

Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBDF1ACE12 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:12:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eCqoYoElHHMY for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE1081A1DBE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 06:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [198.252.137.35] (helo=JcK-HP8200.jck.com) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1YTsz9-000LaA-70; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:12:15 -0500
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:12:10 -0500
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <076F8D2F0D89742134B8D451@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <tsl7fuumdqi.fsf@mit.edu>
References: <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu> <2DF7230C-D1D8-4B21-9003-B336108A38CB@vpnc.org> <20150224172649.GX1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tslvbircj0d.fsf@mit.edu> <0325DF3F-17F3-4400-BDEA-EDB5334BF35C@frobbit.se> <20150225180227.GT1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <7AB921D35A7F9B23A53BD11A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tslvbip8io6.fsf@mit.edu> <54F09A35.9060506@qti.qualcomm.com> <54F78650.6070503@qti.qualcomm.com> <20150305064513.GH1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <54F7FE09.3030200@cisco.com> <7111545C27DE9021135BE185@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tslegp3o0zn.fsf@mit.edu> <6FC72D10-6AF2-4F84-B1AC-27F5B7E632AC@frobbit.se> <707B021F63C5C411E563AE4B@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <93DFD15D-4ED3-4FEE-B26B-F6578459137D@frobbit.se> <F03661F9CDFC6686BF2AE425@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tsl7fuumdqi.fsf@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.35
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/chkesPzRXB8Kumm6NZ2k-5fHQxc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 08:08:20 -0800
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, ietf@ietf.org, Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>, =?UTF-8?Q?Patrik_F=C3=A4ltstr=C3=B6m?= <paf@frobbit.se>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 14:12:28 -0000


--On Friday, March 06, 2015 08:56 -0500 Sam Hartman
<hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> wrote:

> I think that the security considerations in -10 are better
> than what we seem to be wordsmithing on the list.
> My preference is to call -10 good enough in this regard
> especially given that it is informational.
> 
> I don't support  a desire to reduce the strength of security
> warnings in the document, as I think John may be asking for.

No, I'm not.  I think they are fine.  I just see diminishing
returns in further holding the document up for fine tuning.  And
I essentially agree with the part of Viktor's recent comments
that I interpret as saying "good enough".

> However personally I don' have the energy to really engage in
> much more of a discussion for this document.
> 
> I think AS work is quite important,  and I hope that happens
> at a time when I have energy to participate but it's far more
> important to me that it happen regardless of my participation.

Me too.  For both of us.

    john