Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 26 February 2015 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BDFA1A1BE4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:27:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.366
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ryFj54m_ycV for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71F21A1AF0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C412005D82D; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:27:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=E8u5YUeII5RM/7foak9AJXCETbo=; b=rs/UHqQiraY KnJ+/VP84DFeb9PPj/xAdeX3AzqmxTVGiUYteyleQ2tKp9ikwuV8vUQJ+y9bUkC/ D/L/yz3N0bqAaljMIxb9G7E6GsqfiBpdkJQXBUJtsBEHozhCJyYT+AomeSU4kvv9 ihJHRFoUrc2Mq8Wh2qGCVF7khAeSPeK4=
Received: from localhost (108-207-244-174.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.207.244.174]) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a105.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 739672005D82C; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:27:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:27:27 -0600
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Patrik =?iso-8859-1?B?RuRsdHN0cvZt?= <paf@frobbit.se>
Subject: Re: (short version) Re: Last Call: <draft-faltstrom-uri-10.txt> (The Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) DNS Resource Record) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20150226192726.GH9895@localhost>
References: <tsl8ufoh9ko.fsf@mit.edu> <2DF7230C-D1D8-4B21-9003-B336108A38CB@vpnc.org> <20150224172649.GX1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <tslvbircj0d.fsf@mit.edu> <0325DF3F-17F3-4400-BDEA-EDB5334BF35C@frobbit.se> <20150225180227.GT1260@mournblade.imrryr.org> <7AB921D35A7F9B23A53BD11A@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <tslvbip8io6.fsf@mit.edu> <20150226170621.GC9895@localhost> <1BC5EA07-D12E-4DEC-A055-830077350A69@frobbit.se>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1BC5EA07-D12E-4DEC-A055-830077350A69@frobbit.se>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/a1c1w9sZ8a7jc4t2cZNTIcOvLsA>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 19:27:29 -0000

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:26:07PM +0100, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> > On 26 feb 2015, at 18:06, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:
> > If the authors lack the energy for it, perhaps we can move this
> > discussion to SAAG and find volunteers to write and debate the necessary
> > text.
> 
> At the moment, as I have been trying to push this draft through the
> IETF process since 2007 (!) I have obviously not run out of energy
> yet.

!

> That said, I want clear instructions from IETF in what direction I
> should go, i.e. I want IESG to tell me (i.e. an AD).

Well, given that new uses are popping up, and given all the commentary
here, if we have another go at this, I'll review and participate.

Nico
--