Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 02:32 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44708130DD0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JWFOnM_9O1p4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd31.google.com (mail-io1-xd31.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C99D128B14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd31.google.com with SMTP id e12-v6so10710584iok.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Lipb/sTmsBxD8kLGQFaqjVBsObHOFYTbY1AZggTHEXI=; b=HV8V0PIt6U0IxWYhjNwwbk8SfnvoXQFv2VCCXSYOQtlA9dpaHnfDmiF+zK703BzVSL dEVweVdr5TDzPqFsi5JXL9DE1p5fQk4YejkF18GI/iMc+S8wXbmfah6dJRXP9lprJ98p modSsWVCuzIe01WKP89v5ItxuyRSY6Wy8WRsfrNEAb8a7INbji1dXigcL+VyUfAN7N7c LKQTXh/UVRgIdEhy+LWU3Lp/UGyS31i6jIN6RTOtvLOElqxEHAY9TwQPWD4kbGgONrNV OgosfPj3JuitrfCJsDZ5+IAy0YxSkb6T4gZzQXEMj3Ilj0WC/b/GM6Il7eeKnty3Qjed jQ4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Lipb/sTmsBxD8kLGQFaqjVBsObHOFYTbY1AZggTHEXI=; b=qIme/9Ed6yzI6GCo9hvb3mtCrXfT6Ec4z0U9747oUdNOK4lQz9A2THic0e3SjfuVyX BiHPZO5wiLaxD2P6swQ0pE0D78z7sMlOHPT5wSJGMvWz6NMaGw5bMx9Ea9gj2a2qSCfN LcB7OhS3UjHZm3gwiSfn3g7I+t60sxRjj+if2bRTHCkrCmuwbMirpS1gP8HAhMH+MG1e aEXlRtBT1q47N3NyFaNDCvpKyRiPTZd8p3w0LJ/8Erni2+5no2Cm3YX1kt0JDpVtJhCl yxHqIt3L4aQEMvlYNjrPkPBW8qNtJyGABDscV3vEOLSDQbHV8ZsCx98ZhiSxdEwMTtVN KB4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BLNwf3ofM091iwrw3u50yyYeXJW1FXIQqhoRoDQxPP/Y4ETlXO 2rJHcsl3UObYGd5H9MOOEUWStDE1g4+3ICaMGRNGXA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdY/f1DWsn8C57gSHgTuLfL1G9zQBWKS9mZjQ6ZyED9d9K6avtcY0k8QnvLGai7R281H+zIRUDG+Si47vAWA/2A=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:9108:: with SMTP id t8-v6mr36188381iod.260.1537497133332; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 19:32:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <20180920174256.GC68853@isc.org> <5BA454E1.4020105@signal100.com>
In-Reply-To: <5BA454E1.4020105@signal100.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:31:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rd6e0yG_OffDcCVgLa0ayEDPcfF4yb1a=1d0d3rMZD=0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
To: mark.rousell@signal100.com
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000079bf22057658723f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4nVCyF1v4QvaFQ7EU4jRq_iIcE0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 02:32:16 -0000

On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:18 PM Mark Rousell <mark.rousell@signal100.com>
wrote:

> On 20/09/2018 18:42, Evan Hunt wrote:
>
>  The use of a term that's likely be *perceived* as weighted by some
> readers -- even if the author didn't intend it that way, and even if person
> who coined the term in the first place didn't intend it that way -- can
> still hinder communication with those readers.
>
> [...]
>
> If it's easy to find an equivalent term without the baggage, then it seems
> like common sense to use that term instead.
>
>
> Reasonable common sense to my mind is to use clear, established, industry
> standard terminology and for people with baseless perceptions that such
> terminology is somehow aimed at them to learn that the context matters
> (i.e. that contextually relevant usage of certain terms is not "weighted"
> or negative in any way whatsoever).
>

While I do agree with John Levine that there are many additional human
rights and issues to consider,
I don't see how one can disregard the origins of "blacklist".  These don't
sound neutral - and saying it is industry standard is
another way of saying "keep out" to those impacted or that they must deal
with the stereotypes and unpleasant reminders.

 WE invent what becomes industry standard terminology - and  given that the
next challenge is growing the Internet to the next
billion people, whom will come from different cultures, countries, and
backgrounds - taking a few moments for a descriptive and thoughtful
term isn't a lot to ask.

Please consider if you have ever had a term or terminology that disturbs or
bothers you.
Here's another trivial one - people using "guys" instead of "folks" - each
use serves to remind women that they are the
exception or allowed because their gender doesn't matter.

Being inclusive is about being welcoming and not merely not deliberately
hostile.  To grow the technical community in diversity and
including many viewpoints to handle new technical challenges as more folks
join the Internet, this matters.

Regards,
Alia

-- 
> Mark Rousell
>
>
>
>
>