Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Thu, 20 September 2018 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24479130DD9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:12:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VCT70_Bl5mjU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAUVE.mrochek.com (unknown [66.159.242.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998F1130DBE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01QXHSCOXGAO007678@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:07:27 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET="us-ascii"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01QXHS75RAWW00004T@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Cc: Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-id: <01QXHSCLVPZ000004T@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:04:52 -0700
Subject: Re: Diversity and offensive terminology in RFCs
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Thu, 20 Sep 2018 10:37:19 -0400" <A96C9C94-AFF6-4EDF-9E19-26BADCD8B396@mnot.net>
References: <cafa1282-ae6a-93de-ea4a-d100af28d8b8@digitaldissidents.org> <A96C9C94-AFF6-4EDF-9E19-26BADCD8B396@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wJ7lwrGecCawO0MIKbmXMeFrx4w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 15:12:37 -0000

> Hi Niels,

> As my wife so often tells our kids, "manners cost nothing."

Sometimes they do:

  https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/07/130709-asiana-flight-214-crash-korean-airlines-culture-outliers/

There is a cost to political correctness. Even converations like this one have
a cost.

				Ned

> Considering that the RFC series is archival and therefore our words will live for a long time, it's also prudent to be careful with our words. Consider how casual racism and sexism from even twenty years ago is perceived now.

> So I think that this should be highlighted on the shepherd's checklist <https://www.ietf.org/iesg/template/doc-writeup-essay-style.html> -- e.g., "Is the terminology used in the draft unnecessarily specific to one culture, or potentially offensive?".

> The RFC Editor might also want to make these considerations part of their process, in consultation with the stream managers.

> Cheers,


> > On 20 Sep 2018, at 5:25 am, Niels ten Oever <lists@digitaldissidents.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On the hrpc-list [0] there has been an intense conversation which was
> > spurred by the news that the Python community removed Master/Slave
> > terminology from its programming language [1].
> >
> > In the discussion that followed it was remarked that in RFCs terms like
> > Master/Slave, blacklist/whitelist, man-in-middle, and other terminology
> > that is offensive to some people and groups is quite common.
> >
> > This is not a discussion that can be resolved in hrpc, but rather should
> > be dealt with in the IETF community (because hrpc doesn't make policy
> > for terminology in the IETF), which is why I am posting this here.
> >
> > If people find the discussion worthwhile, we might also be just in time
> > to request a BoF on this topic.
> >
> > Looking forward to discuss.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > [0] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/
> > [1]
> > https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8x7akv/masterslave-terminology-was-removed-from-python-programming-language
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niels ten Oever
> > Researcher and PhD Candidate
> > Datactive Research Group
> > University of Amsterdam
> >
> > PGP fingerprint	   2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
> >                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3
> >

> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/