Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net> Wed, 18 June 2014 17:24 UTC
Return-Path: <hsantos@isdg.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D7C1A0051 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ugy1XjNTpUfW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ntbbs.santronics.com (listserv.winserver.com [208.247.131.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A101A004A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; d=isdg.net; s=tms1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/relaxed; l=841; t=1403112277; h=Received:Received: Message-Id:From:Subject:Date:To:Organization:List-ID; bh=Z1kYZwj Iw/SP7EZIbHX/Zkq3H74=; b=Lsve1MgBRv76G9m8HP8ZtKYy67uIYBX+6/w0cGX h2sYHYTVaeZ0c1BpED/sOXzlsesxqhwUXRoEoMLDwp+mEeYZj/AgDkIXYidSFoSm L/eJP0Nta14YiQTa4OqKFEKIofXM32A22moHrPoPvmbA0n9x8X3egJRUzEK8Qgx/ VGzE=
Received: by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP Router v7.0.454.4) for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:24:37 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.162] (99-72-160-212.lightspeed.miamfl.sbcglobal.net [99.72.160.212]) by winserver.com (Wildcat! SMTP v7.0.454.4) with ESMTP id 2592392587.34700.328; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:24:37 -0400
References: <9DAFD7B8DAA49A1629E4CC7E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAMm+LwhakExz_wAnWy3eizvhC8Lzs1RhZWmJK+-Yp5d9zHPwOA@mail.gmail.com> <539BF66B.3020404@bbiw.net> <CAMm+Lwjr8tjR1-yaJdtG8GhNQ7+G5g5xCUDcNSSA6Qkd4JzW5A@mail.gmail.com> <539C5ED6.7080708@meetinghouse.net> <01P8ZV7PHO8M0049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <539CAD2E.6030805@gmail.com> <01P907G00ESM0049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <539F5828.60403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.19.9991.1406161432260.11755@auge.gateway.2wire.net> <20140616235540.GC2214@thunk.org> <6C327290EAFAB2FEE15F5FA9@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <2FC96FA4-5EF0-4F0A-9E3E-5DD42BEA8A25@nominum.com> <62BB2DC3A8B0A3A93833E5C5@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAPv4CP_M0O0vhGRJm9NF+1G1RYPtPG_L86Oz2x=0nUa=ANymkA@mail.gmail.com> <568D757BC9C61D83B86AA45D@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAMm+LwhGMEkF=EgjsS_b0AVZUvkB3ueA=LCG+drr9xfH-jjv5A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhGMEkF=EgjsS_b0AVZUvkB3ueA=LCG+drr9xfH-jjv5A@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28917025-969E-45EA-9261-40E9BB85EAA9@isdg.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (11B651)
From: Hector Santos <hsantos@isdg.net>
Subject: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:24:34 -0400
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/6fuuDYaRvXmkW8HcpTSfgiGPHXg
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:24:49 -0000
> On Jun 18, 2014, at 10:13 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> wrote: > > As for being a low volume mail user, I am currently using 10Gb of my 15Gb free Gmail allowance. The reason I use Gmail to do my IETF mail is that I can't wait half an hour for IMAP or POP to sync each time I want to read mail. > That should only be an issue the first time. And the only thing that I can see off-hand with pop3 is if the client is not issuing the server update command with is QUIT. In other words, your device mail app and/or connectivity is dropping rather than gracefully closing then session. The explicitly issued QUIT command is the only way the server to know you successful got your mail and can begin some backend marking of reception. -- Hector Santos http://www.santronics.com
- Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Martin Rex
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Dave Crocker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. John C Klensin
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Ted Lemon
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Ted Lemon
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Miles Fidelman
- Webmail is implementation, not Internet architect… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Tony Finch
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Ted Lemon
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Tony Finch
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Joe Abley
- Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC. John C Klensin
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Miles Fidelman
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… ned+ietf
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Dave Crocker
- email client popularity [was Webmail is implement… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… ned+ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Change the mailing list protocol… Brandon Long
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Eric Burger
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… ned+ietf
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Stephen Casner
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Ted Lemon
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Tony Finch
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Ted Lemon
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Scott Brim
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Hector Santos
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… John C Klensin
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Hector Santos
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Miles Fidelman
- Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is imple… Hector Santos
- Re: Webmail is implementation, not Internet archi… Mark Rousell