Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]

Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Mon, 16 June 2014 23:55 UTC

Return-Path: <tytso@thunk.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772911A02D3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QCPxyz8Yo4y3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe96:be03]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A8881A02D2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 16:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thunk.org; s=ef5046eb; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=zg3RUOslp2YUSPFyscbC7sRKmd6Y90FUD9piy0hCqPE=; b=orN8CymxaLixASdgcxJKpwKiRMSVJc9n/Psxw0aMRRU8R2Oq8EaSCP4+lvtWONEHdpSkBc0apm7vPRipTbq+U8BPMCIBzsQft8BN7UogjDKpckFOmYSSirgmWddpreiRmAiy0ga3jr1M52iKGGmvQmNeOkiS6MGZoAr0rSPEZ6M=;
Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by imap.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tytso@thunk.org>) id 1WwgkX-0008Ad-Be; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:55:41 +0000
Received: by closure.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id C93795802F6; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:55:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 19:55:40 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Stephen Casner <casner@acm.org>
Subject: Re: email client popularity [was Webmail is implementation, not Internet architecture (was Re: Change the mailing list protocol, not DMARC.)]
Message-ID: <20140616235540.GC2214@thunk.org>
References: <9DAFD7B8DAA49A1629E4CC7E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAMm+LwhakExz_wAnWy3eizvhC8Lzs1RhZWmJK+-Yp5d9zHPwOA@mail.gmail.com> <539BF66B.3020404@bbiw.net> <CAMm+Lwjr8tjR1-yaJdtG8GhNQ7+G5g5xCUDcNSSA6Qkd4JzW5A@mail.gmail.com> <539C5ED6.7080708@meetinghouse.net> <01P8ZV7PHO8M0049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <539CAD2E.6030805@gmail.com> <01P907G00ESM0049PU@mauve.mrochek.com> <539F5828.60403@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.19.9991.1406161432260.11755@auge.gateway.2wire.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.19.9991.1406161432260.11755@auge.gateway.2wire.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ECYxmLclNeuUBGj4V6R4xFKsQ6w
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 23:55:46 -0000

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 02:33:09PM -0700, Stephen Casner wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2014, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
> > I believe I am in a tiny, tiny minority by running my email
> > client in 'plain text' mode unless I receive a message that is
> > incomprehensible without setting 'original html' mode.
> 
> I'm with you there.

Ditto.  But whenver these sorts of discussions come up, it's always
pointed out that engineers don't count when product managers are
making their decisions.  :-(

			- Ted (who is using "mutt" and "offlineimap")