Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Thu, 03 October 2013 14:21 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B24C21F9926 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dKzupIg75Ukl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C09A21F87B7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id z5so2073570lbh.37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:14:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=RYToDKHPXEYVV5UHo4o++nDdl5XnDvYhZvBrjnS9gOM=; b=tes8XNrlGRotIaFoOn5ydXOgcAwnOJBDuEVVCp1LlcfAanNwnj11dn/wJ0xHAx9vS9 CJhtsyzxFgQEmdEI4dbAwglCZxVOl7o0Fqf+5dkIX7R1d9bBOs55YNUlyVA4r4/MmRJR N8On2ceHaf6cMNgbsSZRGLkiUFwxSDDIb8B0wiGVZeB1qdkszS47zmMvGycxIFbaRqyq MQitHd/e+8JPRNRMCKvARYNdktg3hSxD8U4DpKqBlWe0V/ngcUhCLT9quWCE7p+rKyIE I+pnArrAdwQ4E5eyy3U+6Kk6V9i2FJsjvLpifJ3hh2wdE5FUN10ecdmgrbC7RYGqMYEh wshw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.72.100 with SMTP id c4mr492048lbv.57.1380809658902; Thu, 03 Oct 2013 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.112.134.232 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Oct 2013 07:14:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLtMNgCLEUF1DKtVizD4z-WyP2qjrFtQK-ADT8TQoOBMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20131002144143.20697.85830.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <7102E82AB09013B67371807F@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CALaySJLtMNgCLEUF1DKtVizD4z-WyP2qjrFtQK-ADT8TQoOBMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 10:14:18 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Wv9CFT41QR8sLHCgAPOOonQtXT4
Message-ID: <CAC4RtVBxZ+ELU4u3M--t8onK0xLU0zw5gthuRBzWTvTRiFwPjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 5617) to Internet Standard
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 14:21:02 -0000
>> Hi. Just to be sure that everyone has the same understanding of >> what is being proposed here, the above says "to Historic" but >> the writeup at >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-adsp-rfc5617-to-historic/ >> says "to Internet Standard". Can one or the other be corrected? > > Gakk. I don't know how that happened. I'll see if the Secretariat > can fix it. I'm sure it's my fault...... Noting that this has been fixed and that a revised Last Call note went out. Please, if you continue this discussion, change the subject line to say "Historic" instead of "Internet Standard", so no one is confused by the dissonance. Thanks, all, and my apologies again for the error in the title. Barry
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John Levine
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- RE: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… ietfdbh
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Scott Kitterman
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Douglas Otis
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP to Hi… Hector Santos
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Barry Leiba
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Douglas Otis
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: How to protect DKIM signatures: Moving ADSP t… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bob Braden
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Eliot Lear
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Hector Santos
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bradner, Scott
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Bradner, Scott
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Procedural Changes through side-effect (was: Re: … John C Klensin
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Dave Crocker
- Re: Procedural Changes through side-effect (was: … S Moonesamy
- Spontaneous Procedure Invention ( was Re: Procedu… Dave Crocker
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… S Moonesamy
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… Barry Leiba
- Re: Last Call: Change the status of ADSP (RFC 561… S Moonesamy