IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

"Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net> Fri, 28 March 2003 01:26 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA29968; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:26:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18yiqg-00072s-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:40:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yiq0-00070f-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:39:20 -0500
Received: from tndh.net (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA29864 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 20:23:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eagleswings (127.0.0.1) by library with [XMail 1.10 (Win32/Ix86) ESMTP Server] id <S233B5> for <ietf@ietf.org> from <alh-ietf@tndh.net>; Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:26:12 -0800
Reply-To: alh-ietf@tndh.net
From: Tony Hain <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
To: 'Margaret Wasserman' <mrw@windriver.com>
Cc: 'The IETF' <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:26:09 -0800
Message-ID: <058a01c2f4c9$037af9b0$ee1a4104@eagleswings>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20030327200316.0523b5e8@mail.windriver.com>
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by ietf.org id UAA29968

Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> There have been people calling for the complete removal of 
> site-local addressing all along.
> 
> And, elimination/deprecation was quite clearly raised as an 
> option in Atlanta.  At that time, we called for opinions on 
> the following
> options:  elimination, "limited", "moderate" or "full" usage, 
> and each of the four options had some support in that WG meeting.

And in Atlanta we all agreed to take elimination off the list, and it
has not been discussed since. The agenda for SF was:
Site-Local Addressing
  Impact of site-local addressing -- Margaret Wasserman (20 min)
 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-02.tx
t

  "Limited Usage" Summary -- Margaret Wasserman (5 min)
  [See appendix of draft-wasserman-ipv6-sl-impact-02, above.]

  "Moderate Usage" Proposal -- Bob Hinden (15 min)
 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hinden-ipv6-sl-moderate-01.txt

Nowhere in that or the mail preceding the meeting is elimination
mentioned. 

Tony

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email