Re: NomCom procedures revision

[Brian E Carpenter <[e-mail]>]

On 01/09/2015 16:26, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 4:05 PM, John C Klensin <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
>>> One way out is to decouple this question from RFC7437bis by
>>> designing an RFC3933 Process Experiment (i.e. try out an
>>> alternative qualification rule for a couple of years,
>>> reverting to the current rule afterwards by default).
>>
>> This may be too radical but, in the spirit of allowing people to
>> apply discretion, let me success such a process experiment based
>> on the principle that the reason for Nomcom-volunteer
>> qualification rules is to be sure that the selecting members of
>> the Nomcom have a reasonable understanding of the IETF and how
>> it works.   For the purpose of this experiment,
>> [...]
>>
> 
> For my own clarification, would we publish the current draft without
> changing the qualification criteria, and then either revise and republish
> or do an "Updates" draft after the process experiment?  Or would we run the
> experiment and hold the draft until the experiment is done?

My suggestion was the first one: publish what you have now, then try
the experiment. Experiments can fail.

   Brian