IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 11 July 2016 22:06 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33E9112B03B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecs.soton.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uh9wOTTfsRse for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DBDF12D0B7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6BM6Us4027202; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:06:30 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk u6BM6Us4027202
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1468274790; bh=wiVsiV0Z5qyjggHOo+ZWD9g9vGQ=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=ElV0au3Kh9NnCp441So1iv2IQuoAXT0fcO03dFratXah2G5Qgb9+NQFJwjVT87NPs K9EBin1CjAdLmC9ionSN7AHMCE1aJdfE0/5nbJx38zQvjdF0eUlFKMBrScKW7rmikg MrPt5XtTwoN6c8ut6JA0qABr9PJ6AXGS4ADBd2ts=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25d]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id s6AN6U2925113626Qp ret-id none; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:06:30 +0100
Received: from 20010a88d51011.ipv6.customer.clara.net (20010a88d51011.ipv6.customer.clara.net [IPv6:2001:a88:d510:1101:a5de:6888:c656:9c03] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6BM5oIC010531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:06:27 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <2dde4660-ceab-ed06-67bf-33e1a374ea6f@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 23:07:15 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|5e26950a648d186181ffc6ab411092e8s6AN6U03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|BB2CEF81-7795-449C-87FA-8D6D52B5536A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com> <64DB4F404F7B3FD5A007BEA2@JcK-HP8200> <86428765-1C82-4434-B6DA-89E34DB599E2@piuha.net> <42F9A871-3D50-4374-93C4-3B45A248C3ED@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|da5a10cfc0197d092106b3d9438f7afbs6AKLf03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|42F9A871-3D50-4374-93C4-3B45A248C3ED@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <2dde4660-ceab-ed06-67bf-33e1a374ea6f@dcrocker.net> <BB2CEF81-7795-449C-87FA-8D6D52B5536A@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=s6AN6U292511362600; tid=s6AN6U2925113626Qp; client=relay,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=4:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: u6BM6Us4027202
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/H4nvUf_fnFrrRwxX4IsoungFdV0>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 22:06:44 -0000

> On 11 Jul 2016, at 22:29, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
> On 7/11/2016 8:22 PM, Tim Chown wrote:
>> Can we make sure this question is asked explicitly in the post-meeting survey?
> 
> What is 'this' question?
> 
> Surveys need to ask the right questions and they need to ask them very carefully.  My guess is that 'this' is actually a set of questions.

Indeed. 

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email