IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A27912B047 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLvYT6K0D2ro for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x233.google.com (mail-qk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43C3412B03A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id p74so61582432qka.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZqA0Ms6QGRu9kVI2yd8iTZ9G7f+tSvINKvIO0bCUsy8=; b=Tjs1pGyVEtEcLuGMtzhfmQU17gcwyaVDqXWc4oHwfF8URESvi2ARvq/jqFYIveoTd1 70KSFmuJJBxibOEq2yXvMQSWmjiOxiioNL3PiiUDx6n72pwLKrJ8wgu/jJ1N6Io2kwVE rKw43WHARItMVrkBaq41dUXENdhq5xw8s44/p9+z4JQcYnC7AwArXuucYq0XguIL+UjY MvLL02IpUkkyLjEub/svrOGC2ChayBSnifnSwGk7wrmQJhKRcKxrkLGjwJxpDVRLeTOJ 2kOvH/QcgTu3aKfOQvs78fnGtnkrw+59uuM9Ho8wLCGchs/T0/CzRVkmO2pC+8UUliBm HzbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZqA0Ms6QGRu9kVI2yd8iTZ9G7f+tSvINKvIO0bCUsy8=; b=RjkqDj9jaL/ziUYQs8utVnd+lHyvMF1YUHvG5fFnjlk9IGI9C3MDEnFvAZkiCNmyLe gXnFX2tcWKntLdJU1/ne0S6Vfi4k8LXx3AAe7/tnc/j5By0r93kcEoSqmSynDfwepm4f rqcLlgw8FWTLYJx/Bv40pAfaDxQ3Nli/XcwHtQZlS+93UIZnQsP8WFB7Q+bwDjXXyz1Z hgNjFtvS6pEueCvWNcaPHnITWeHa6j/1tjjvby+Hc5fI6xLBafugV2K+Ci2C1RALxRBx SHteMuEmhupLHAds6mG6qcBoKZzrwqFHinUSgdeN6oLpBE4sROjd3Ai9dkMitjds4TY6 PsCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKTIUJ+Snc4egxS8UP8FXztTYfbCpVhsWj/aoGPd8IoRMNrQsTs01uyFCKBzIXd7Xl6B6LvQ2G4jHA6JQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.73.148 with SMTP id w142mr26699881qka.77.1468251907413; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.57.81 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 08:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <41f9104e-335f-b2a9-3ca8-9d5b0e7de3b6@gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 11:45:06 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rc=zzbCBVjecApJPYA4zpsH+N-LGKN0SmDAfGD67s+5jg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
To: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a880861ddbc05375e0901"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/wfes-OQ4MzcHtUUsJ0GsCM6swEA>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:45:10 -0000

The meeting sessions are running an hour later than they otherwise would
have.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I don't know about relaxing in the evening, although finishing an
> hour earlier might help those with jet lag.
>
> I am more concerned that we have wasted five hours of meeting time
> that could have been used to reduce meeting conflicts, and thus
> enable better cross area review.
>
> Stewart
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 13:56, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Where do I find the discussion and subsequent rough consensus to switch
>> the
>> starting time of the IETF f2f meeting days to 10 a.m.?
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned that is a big mistake, wasting an hour every day
>> and making it (even more) difficult to relax in the evenings.
>>
>> (If there is some local peculiarity in Buenos Aires and Berlin that makes
>> this more practical, it would be interesting to know.)
>>
>> Regards
>>     Brian
>>
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email