IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 10 a.m.

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 11 July 2016 13:49 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF49A12D195 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:49:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ecs.soton.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QN3HKDGt4Yju for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD7BB12D125 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 06:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6BDmw1C002429; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:48:58 +0100
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk u6BDmw1C002429
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=201304; t=1468244938; bh=M/1BTLDWAiRfbOlvIZJuHo07/bM=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=2Ol9OeGynQe8HAymiE0UbTkCLvvvitdkMPOL/I7AjShjUEkXU14EYAS12D8/CDrpo KJPvFRgzNA1rkP7AUxBsX2+YZqMvVruz4zw8L0ZgKc7ukQTGCCBi4xQZffqMN6XUCs LPxJC3gtMSTeaXCvUxIofVKnt28QbXTuyAQZxlIs=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id s6AEmw292510696508 ret-id none; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:48:58 +0100
Received: from [192.168.0.6] (tchowndsl.claranet.co.uk [212.188.254.49]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u6BDmsM7023117 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:48:54 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EEB59B73-1423-4690-95E8-9C0F7B17C62E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rcr3Yk4iR5Q0o9vyvR7COOY+qaW2C63TM-vkaXAkqYMvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:49:41 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEW3|0308d300610c0123df56a7ee21b1b33es6AEmw03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|5EA6A07F-EE58-4F39-8502-A4FA1282E954@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <CAG4d1rcr3Yk4iR5Q0o9vyvR7COOY+qaW2C63TM-vkaXAkqYMvQ@mail.gmail.com> <5EA6A07F-EE58-4F39-8502-A4FA1282E954@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=s6AEmw292510696500; tid=s6AEmw292510696508; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=3:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: u6BDmw1C002429
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/k0NW3OXqNmJBRBUpBbpprg0cGWw>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 13:49:04 -0000

Hi,

I share Brian’s concern on this.

> On 11 Jul 2016, at 14:10, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Brian,
> 
> In Buenos Aires, the dinner times are substantially later and the schedule was
> adjusted to accommodate local conditions.  There was a lot of positive feedback 
> about the later starting time.

Was this one of the questions in the post-meeting survey, and if so what was the result?

> I'm sure you remember the Paris meeting where the IETF tried a different evening
> schedule & it was very popular.  
> 
> So, in response to the feedback and as an experiment, the starting time is later.
> I believe Alexa included that this was an experiment in announcements.

I’m not against experiments, but I don’t recall any open list discussion on conducting it, which would have been nice to have, or did that happen?

Tim

> Regards,
> Alia
> 
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com <mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Where do I find the discussion and subsequent rough consensus to switch the
> starting time of the IETF f2f meeting days to 10 a.m.?
> 
> As far as I'm concerned that is a big mistake, wasting an hour every day
> and making it (even more) difficult to relax in the evenings.
> 
> (If there is some local peculiarity in Buenos Aires and Berlin that makes
> this more practical, it would be interesting to know.)
> 
> Regards
>    Brian
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email