Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Sun, 12 August 2012 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9266621F86C1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LPpSMQ1KYhMZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F8421F86B0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E38EA6000B; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASsdI2UhvOSO; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.5] (cpe-98-154-13-152.socal.res.rr.com [98.154.13.152]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5662A60002; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5027ED27.2040403@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 15:34:43 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7A75A5D6-869F-4C19-9044-006CB9930AE4@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <u2b8y2x43qn1esn7ege163mo.1344689258582@email.android.com> <50266F05.5050601@dcrocker.net> <1C6BB491-8B0B-4432-B633-6D8AA3B6477E@tzi.org> <50267826.70307@bbiw.net> <CAC4RtVARm1fXvHR4dv9Jh0HttW+ORhRx36kwF54RRjc4aOh1AQ@mail.gmail.com> <5027D0B2.80306@bbiw.net> <CALaySJKzxo=oHLcDxT=RbrwMK=pTSh6vxY-VvLZ0C5wf+T-DQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5027D67B.2030409@dcrocker.net> <5027ED27.2040403@cisco.com>
To: stbryant@cisco.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: IAB <iab@iab.org>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:34:55 -0000

On Aug 12, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Stewart Bryant wrote:

> Dave
> 
> If I interpret what you seem to be saying, it is that you care
> more for the micro-observance of IETF protocol, than
> taking steps to avoid Internet governance being
> transferred by government decree to a secretive
> agency of the UN that runs by government majority.
> 
> Is that a correct assessments of your priorities?
> 
> Stewart


Personally I do not feel the tone of this message is most appropriate in this ongoing discussion.

Lixia