RE: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)

"Christian Huitema" <huitema@huitema.net> Thu, 17 December 2015 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDC01A6F17 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:40:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3hmpn3vwWg0m for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp04.mail2web.com (xsmtp04.mail2web.com [168.144.250.231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85BA71A8725 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:40:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.5.2.13] (helo=xmail03.myhosting.com) by xsmtp04.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1a9dTa-0000de-OQ for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:40:31 -0500
Received: (qmail 28904 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2015 18:40:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO huitema2) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[131.107.147.15]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail03.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <adrian@olddog.co.uk>; 17 Dec 2015 18:40:29 -0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
To: 'Alia Atlas' <akatlas@gmail.com>, 'Adrian Farrel' <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
References: <076c01d138e7$0a68dba0$1f3a92e0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAG4d1reLOR+13XFt_2GU0hH5-Ob0smbg9XhgrHq0wWk5SV77iw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1reLOR+13XFt_2GU0hH5-Ob0smbg9XhgrHq0wWk5SV77iw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:40:41 -0800
Message-ID: <052e01d138fa$6f1aecb0$4d50c610$@huitema.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQKby5pjuyWL9YMFu9E2LxxpM1y4uwE/umIHnTBetkA=
Subject: RE: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Ii2gGbuvLnndFLKbhL8abWJp0js>
Cc: 'Phillip Hallam-Baker' <phill@hallambaker.com>, 'IETF Discussion Mailing List' <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:40:34 -0000

On Thursday, December 17, 2015 9:35 AM, Alia Atlas wrote:

> The number of morning meetings vary - for the IESG it's usually 2.   For the IAB it's
> usually 2.  For the overlap, that's usually 4 - though not all needed liaisons in Yokohama.
> If I have meetings after dinner, those usually go until late and are quite useful.  However,
> that varies by IETF.

Another data point: Nomcom volunteers had similar meeting times and workload in Yokohama. We did not have priority booking, many of us ended up in overflow hotels, yet apparently we managed just fine.

-- Christian Huitema