Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 18:53 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B351B3032 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AptF3PA-JglQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED4551B3031 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y66so47848702oig.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=5fEIh2vO+2HnCcP4bocFkBRS/5evW24aR2evC6YlRcs=; b=avvI5WoAy4MyWx3phgD+O4miEM0EICEftLSNgI69lVQyLIYDWrcnmNAxIZg3QjAaRK +6GQTTz9SdOjKNO1htnUXjdY6H2H0A5sQ9Qzh5XqO86AsiOo+3Wlgwoe9Y6OjFnKeI7E lGfotyiB29qP8bK/8sOvMltkklGO+Jvm2gXhsaXq3Ctx2WmMvg/E0wi9vz2odQCH176E 2+DvhK2muypbXfdgoLIOxlmsvoWrxLUDVGw7XYrpmE1XY8SQwqE1+78PdSX8v6RuKp8B 9EG4dvmOf2RxpvFM2/bYHmcG7S1FIQk7ur41BSdh/VcSDRy8XK9gjvrzwtLH3kLpBkAs SSxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.83.74 with SMTP id h71mr13011670oib.115.1450378433364; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.60.177.103 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 10:53:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <052e01d138fa$6f1aecb0$4d50c610$@huitema.net>
References: <076c01d138e7$0a68dba0$1f3a92e0$@olddog.co.uk> <CAG4d1reLOR+13XFt_2GU0hH5-Ob0smbg9XhgrHq0wWk5SV77iw@mail.gmail.com> <052e01d138fa$6f1aecb0$4d50c610$@huitema.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 13:53:53 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1reJcuoY8VNu4dd3qfuBRoB=RPoObFSPqSKWesF-D-XLjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d12a44f8d8c05271c8b9c"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lOnULusQYQgEw8e7fubAouFoaVg>
Cc: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 18:53:56 -0000

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
wrote:

> On Thursday, December 17, 2015 9:35 AM, Alia Atlas wrote:
>
> > The number of morning meetings vary - for the IESG it's usually 2.   For
> the IAB it's
> > usually 2.  For the overlap, that's usually 4 - though not all needed
> liaisons in Yokohama.
> > If I have meetings after dinner, those usually go until late and are
> quite useful.  However,
> > that varies by IETF.
>
> Another data point: Nomcom volunteers had similar meeting times and
> workload in Yokohama. We did not have priority booking, many of us ended up
> in overflow hotels, yet apparently we managed just fine.
>

Absolutely true for Nomcom and similarly there are folks pulling together
BoFs who find they have similar types of schedules.  The only difference is
that this is a schedule that happens every IETF and that IETF is usually
1-1.5 days longer.

I didn't become an AD expecting this pre-reserved hotel block and I can
certainly manage without it.
I do think it makes me more effective so I take advantage of it - but I'd
also be fine taking luck of the
draw.

Regards,
Alia

-- Christian Huitema
>
>
>
>
>