IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Fri, 18 December 2015 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE0B51B3776 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p4J2dAyTJu06 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF7A1B3774 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id p62so8104331qge.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DEZ1VTUoqhjOB2kMynme/kFv/1xH+EfDqaR7gS8YTZU=; b=iUXVI1yCkr/oBUIDdcJ06465gYHW46J27Kl1HHDYhm+m1iPyqYe3bhcVnebJjgklQh d0DRyjwCuDdk0OzyG82SpxgwLgUTZaRxOg1jdcdJHMB450LbxcKsOHkhLdDCtqj6ZuHO 7JXLulg7rhSmrnuXhCk0XT4y7aWN50lM0+fhsQZf/1eg+KpGia3orkZLA2Adlq8dwjae 4Hl9KAcWQjaBKPYgBCbIxQst7mQmaIcsP4nOiHPJ3VNVR1HpRxKv4xMj+LLNEh8jxEil fT7bttNEAntba3IUvrGlUzRAwvdzyGLRJAFtN6K7F9ChNB7ISm3GkgF3LJLj+PNajqjw sPEA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.142.206 with SMTP id 197mr6973249qho.77.1450459656043; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.136.198 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:27:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2egekbgtm.fsf@chopps.org>
References: <076c01d138e7$0a68dba0$1f3a92e0$@olddog.co.uk> <5672E4BB.2050702@dcrocker.net> <FA905E0564B6E47B70076F92@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <m2egekbgtm.fsf@chopps.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:27:35 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAceXNVbZX2EsaTU-4v2jqCD4wxmHvjZh5QuuotrpL8WdNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/MSLgNOtg_M5CfRfHDs1LNdtOcNQ>
Cc: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:27:37 -0000

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 9:01 PM, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> wrote:
>
> Perhaps if a perfect I* block is around 100 (95 this time?), and the
> target block size is 600 rooms, then the I* block should be 1/6 of whatever we
> actually get?  Certainly that would be fair share the pain. Then
> again, maybe these I* folks deserve the rooms regardless given the
> availability and workload expectations. :)
>

Yes, the target block size should be at least 600 not 300.
Yes, alternative hotels should be around 600m not 1.7km.

I hope IOAC is listening.

Behcet
> Thanks,
> Chris.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email