IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 18 December 2015 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944891B37B0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:59:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ls-lqmc9miMc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:59:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.39.168]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DFB131B37AA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:59:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17625 invoked by uid 0); 18 Dec 2015 17:59:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw3) (10.0.90.84) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 18 Dec 2015 17:59:05 -0000
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]) by cmgw3 with id vCyr1r0092SSUrH01Cyu18; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:59:02 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bej4Do/B c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=h1BC+oY+fLhyFmnTBx92Jg==:117 a=wU2YTnxGAAAA:8 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=-NfooI8aBGcA:10 a=uEJ9t1CZtbIA:10 a=wUQvQvOEmiQA:10 a=j1tYsSbykisxY4m5KKsA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=nv1E8mjAIvQA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Cc:References:To:Subject; bh=gBWk5YQeVwhZ+DKjWBpNXdTqpQo/VOhNqeNHOQvHas0=; b=Wz5dZqCTtWJsuLcKRSh55kfsjvbfX4EHroT5XqXhibDTHiNjHumu0agrPsqStoGWnbZfWynh/YTqEem7dlIfFoT270JxQOT38d2BY6c2ecwkGwORrLkQyZBAPod6HiZE;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:41435 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1a9zIr-0007Qw-DI; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:58:53 -0700
Subject: Re: IETF hotel selection mode and a proposal (was" Re: Hilton BA is Booked already?)
To: sarikaya@ieee.org, Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
References: <076c01d138e7$0a68dba0$1f3a92e0$@olddog.co.uk> <5672E4BB.2050702@dcrocker.net> <FA905E0564B6E47B70076F92@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <m2egekbgtm.fsf@chopps.org> <CAC8QAceXNVbZX2EsaTU-4v2jqCD4wxmHvjZh5QuuotrpL8WdNw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <56744957.3040205@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 12:58:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAceXNVbZX2EsaTU-4v2jqCD4wxmHvjZh5QuuotrpL8WdNw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/_E0eH--k-n9yHOnBdPIyvrdkwEU>
Cc: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:59:07 -0000


On 12/18/2015 12:27 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Yes, the target block size should be at least 600 not 300.
> Yes, alternative hotels should be around 600m not 1.7km.
>
> I hope IOAC is listening.

Yes.  Absolutely!

Lou
(IAOC, since March...)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email