IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Wed, 04 September 2013 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4C921F9E83 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.024, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a5aumQthZYKG for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth02.qualcomm.com (sabertooth02.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.38]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BDE621F9E3F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1378253045; x=1409789045; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=T5RvaXhDModgANunR+GM8AqV6WNqRmkr4pJDmQ6mK9s=; b=KOusdTL8PwUOZcrvrZ865mLlh+QpJlriJ3zALf3gfplVuddhL/eQGXeG DVwaxdxFaZIS4cpYtGBQU0b5RZwR89Z2hNx9rNIJPrMmed3sN/4RZbgp4 2d1HXzCZ8WKEeZdIxwgP5YlXzJye1UQCBH9TCtvLoszmH9stArya1cqxN Y=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7187"; a="50894806"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by sabertooth02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2013 17:04:05 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7187"; a="594980455"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Sep 2013 17:03:31 -0700
Received: from null-e899c4b782dd.wlan.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <522678D3.7000704@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:03:31 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130903161345.0bb3bfc0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130903161345.0bb3bfc0@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:04:10 -0000

On 9/3/13 4:28 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Pete,
> At 16:02 03-09-2013, Pete Resnick wrote:
>> OK, does this do anything for anyone?
>>
>>    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
>>    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
>>    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
>>    been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
>>    standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
>>    [IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
>>    from section 6.1.3.
>
> I suggest using "IETF Announce mailing list" as the "publication of 
> record".  The mailing list probably has a wider readership and anyone 
> can subscribe to it.  The usage of the mailing list is also consistent 
> with other parts of RFC 2026.

The IETF Announce list does not say anything about "pending" standards 
actions. The IESG minutes do.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email