IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 23:20 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F6721E80AA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bab2MSpB+GD1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F9721E8087 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:20:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w10so6678630pde.37 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YPLgKnh4VnADvkiJHip/UR6q/l6eBAjQuO1NDYdii70=; b=x2E/6f6wO0D2KMQgjLmLHZMOt42oNfar9caIHjAwdZ/jzzlS+Rmzt130mMvW91Symo zD7Bixz9oMEO0kDmeCBwMS3QoyNJklku/ZnxpVk3j1/PX2ObYXryW2oE20hoF62xtkt/ 89APesXV0rgqQtLNQBzMlv8cCe/k+SM8aR2AZBG4aTv9Br8FN2w44nriK60WWPTFVcn2 ilp6Yi/Cy4Z+Do9XgDgNeBShv0R7zkfE0vJ7+oIHrYnAbDi+/9fKPD7ykoxiTR1fX9eb /DY+ab+l8UYfoITjp316j1AhRUQdrYLU1TFPXB3nZjR+y0rNWWQgkckTqWf4HCe2cCai gy9A==
X-Received: by 10.68.143.131 with SMTP id se3mr33611508pbb.39.1378250419698; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:20:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.30] (70-2-130-248.pools.spcsdns.net. [70.2.130.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ct4sm24935066pbb.41.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52266EB3.7050800@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 18:20:19 -0500
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 23:20:20 -0000

On 9/3/2013 6:02 PM, Pete Resnick wrote:
> On 9/3/13 3:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> <rant class="short">So that the reader of RFC 2026 will need to read yet
>> another document to get the full picture? There are currently 8 RFCs 
>> that
>> update RFC 2026, some of which have been updated themselves.</rant>
>>
>> Quite seriously - I appreciate Pete's reluctance to overload the 
>> draft, but
>> it is a related topic. I'd be inclined to include it.
>
> OK, does this do anything for anyone?
>
>    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
>    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
>    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
>    been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
>    standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
>    [IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
>    from section 6.1.3.

That would work for me.

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email