IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 04 September 2013 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C019221E8103 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.534
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.534 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S+NfckyTzxaJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B3221E80FA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:00:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r8400VYQ026488; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 17:00:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1378252837; bh=ymZEaKWjvilTGaTkDA67/YEhgDQ7X+lGjRH2l90UgrQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=y7mf7OgNRpgoKLRKPAba5MdV/CbEKJbCFkQ5QVd79VBloIttPhIKyGwyLyoOhOffR 232bQG9/NQNicFMy4RHlZy7e0BEYxgKveSbkdEEKiHtQEAs+BY5NMwgC5peAaIb5OS +7Bnrk0gn8OdhUtLBd7TU5yQBdWWRETHjf25PKGY=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1378252837; i=@resistor.net; bh=ymZEaKWjvilTGaTkDA67/YEhgDQ7X+lGjRH2l90UgrQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=whj0BrVuKGMvq41TQsAkpKoDY8SpsjZGOvJ2mO5/ExbF7CuBULeLkHc+Q4ZlUXZrJ MbBZvvVsS1ak79RSjJ5+Tc9btMRQhSXfV2ZDM/a/uo7qQu/515Lnj+yirZu6QmY2Gd WKmc59CrV2SuIjHwjTz1k+Br0uuSc+JN+9LbqdGM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130903161345.0bb3bfc0@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:28:23 -0700
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com>
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 00:00:52 -0000

Hi Pete,
At 16:02 03-09-2013, Pete Resnick wrote:
>OK, does this do anything for anyone?
>
>    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
>    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
>    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
>    been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
>    standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
>    [IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
>    from section 6.1.3.

I suggest using "IETF Announce mailing list" as the "publication of 
record".  The mailing list probably has a wider readership and anyone 
can subscribe to it.  The usage of the mailing list is also 
consistent with other parts of RFC 2026.

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email