IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5739B21F9E9C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:02:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -107.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-107.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JoL-ftAlUsEs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233CB21F9EA2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:02:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1378249346; x=1409785346; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rioaF6krHTLrf5Lq/KWRzvVbkyOAPxjV56J4STeGr9c=; b=jhawB6uKWka4QlEd62SC65Wv03wZLjb6Ty8FXoJzec51vIHF+0DgI0ME dPJ9s8L7cUyustpm+ZcyDZWevC2RaYb0Pkm3j6nisV3mZLG3EeNE/fyeO I5ciX2kSKnadVx4Tk9Ka0yR0Qzzds1hhLDDL105btX0fHGCMO6HQvEK25 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7186"; a="72174120"
Received: from ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com ([10.47.202.180]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 03 Sep 2013 16:02:25 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7186"; a="18779033"
Received: from nasanexhc07.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.39.190]) by ironmsg01-lv.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Sep 2013 16:02:25 -0700
Received: from null-e899c4b782dd.wlan.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.5) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.39.190) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:02:25 -0700
Message-ID: <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:02:24 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.39.5]
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>, "Bradner, Scott" <sob@harvard.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 23:02:30 -0000

On 9/3/13 3:17 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> <rant class="short">So that the reader of RFC 2026 will need to read yet
> another document to get the full picture? There are currently 8 RFCs that
> update RFC 2026, some of which have been updated themselves.</rant>
>
> Quite seriously - I appreciate Pete's reluctance to overload the draft, but
> it is a related topic. I'd be inclined to include it.
>    

OK, does this do anything for anyone?

    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
    been done in recent years, and the "publication of record" for
    standards actions has for some time been the minutes of the IESG.
    [IESG-MINUTES] Therefore, that paragraph is also effectively removed
    from section 6.1.3.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email