IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com> Thu, 05 September 2013 22:24 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CB821E816F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:24:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.017, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0+exuzEa+2um for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sabertooth01.qualcomm.com (sabertooth01.qualcomm.com [65.197.215.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93FF21E8172 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1378419877; x=1409955877; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=g0FxB/UtcCAO9zkd00b0sC23CXswARHuts7LRTHfzXU=; b=lXilhkNBJvMCs82FeASqTDWhcd814gI3Tm61gbxuwoLsVisRE4Zhh/Jb DchB8hswDpweLNlJcnPv2knSk5ucgkvm5hni/xeJ0mxxd9N0qgxtScV6r LAAq3lvpUtb4aN/0BXzVZkRx/VAgDczApr8Pl/TQQAizWgnQaaLAhtI1Q A=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7189"; a="50925119"
Received: from ironmsg04-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.19]) by sabertooth01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 05 Sep 2013 15:24:37 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,7189"; a="506933875"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Sep 2013 15:24:36 -0700
Received: from presnick-mac.wlan.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.2; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 15:20:21 -0700
Message-ID: <522903A4.5040900@qti.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 15:20:20 -0700
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qti.qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130903161345.0bb3bfc0@resistor.net> <522678D3.7000704@qti.qualcomm.com> <5228BB22.4030909@qti.qualcomm.com> <917325CE-1AC9-40CA-92F7-AD28B957DCC2@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <917325CE-1AC9-40CA-92F7-AD28B957DCC2@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 22:24:42 -0000

On 9/5/13 2:45 PM, Scott O Bradner wrote:
> looks good to me except that maybe using the IETF Announce list rather than
> IESG minutes as the publication of record
>    

The only reason I went with the IESG minutes is because they do state 
the "pending" actions too, as well as the completed ones, which the IETF 
Announce list does not. For instance, the IESG minutes say things like:

"The document remains under discussion by the IESG in order to resolve 
points raised by..."

"The document was approved by the IESG pending an RFC Editor Note to be 
prepared by..."

"The document was deferred to the next teleconference by..."

The minutes also of course reflect all of the approvals. So they do seem 
to more completely replace what that paragraph as talking about. And we 
have archives of IESG minutes back to 1991; we've only got IETF Announce 
back to 2004.

I'm not personally committed to going one way or the other. The minutes 
just seemed to me the more complete record.

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. - +1 (858)651-4478

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email